Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 4 Associations of SNPs with smoking status (ex-smokers vs. current smokers)

From: Association between Common Genetic Variants in the Opioid Pathway and Smoking Behaviors in Chinese Men

Model Crude OR (95% CI)a P value Adjusted OR (95% CI)b P value
rs1799971     
Additive 1.00 (0.70–1.43) 0.96 0.99 (0.66–1.48) 0.97
AA vs. AG vs. GG     
Dominant 0.90 (0.56–1.43) 0.66 0.87 (0.51–1.48) 0.62
AA vs. AG + GG     
Recessive 1.41 (0.63–3.15) 0.40 1.40 (0.57–3.42) 0.46
AA + AG vs. GG     
rs3786047     
Additive 1.07 (0.66–1.74) 0.77 1.25 (0.71–2.19) 0.42
GG vs. GA vs. AA     
Dominant 1.04 (0.62–1.75) 0.85 1.23 (0.68–2.22) 0.47
GG vs. GA + AA     
Recessive 1.88 (0.16–21.07) 0.60 2.49 (0.14–43.07) 0.52
GG + GA vs. AA     
rs1045280     
Additive 0.98 (0.61–1.58) 0.95 1.21 (0.70–2.09) 0.48
TT vs. TC vs. CC     
Dominant 0.98 (0.59–1.64) 0.96 1.21 (0.67–2.19) 0.50
TT vs. TC + CC     
Recessive 0.94 (0.13–6.79) 0.95 1.48 (0.14–15.76) 0.74
TT + TC vs. CC     
rs2036657     
Additive 1.04 (0.65–1.66) 0.85 1.26 (0.73–2.16) 0.40
AA vs. AG vs. GG     
Dominant 1.02 (0.61-1.70) 0.93 1.25 (0.69-2.26) 0.45
AA vs. AG + GG     
Recessive 1.42 (0.23–8.66) 0.70 1.88 (0.21–16.24) 0.56
AA + AG vs. GG     
rs3852209     
Additive 0.75 (0.50–1.13) 0.17 0.72 (0.45–1.13) 0.15
CC vs. CT vs. TT     
Dominant 0.63 (0.39–1.03) 0.06 0.54 (0.31–0.95) 0.03
CC vs. CT + TT     
Recessive 1.27 (0.43–3.77) 0.66 1.75 (0.52–5.90) 0.36
CC + CT vs. TT     
rs2278060     
Additive 0.79 (0.53–1.17) 0.24 0.76 (0.49–1.20) 0.24
AA vs. AC vs. CC     
Dominant 0.69 (0.43–1.12) 0.14 0.60 (0.35–1.03) 0.06
AA vs. AC + CC     
Recessive 1.08 (0.38–3.07) 0.87 1.56 (0.48–5.03) 0.45
AA + AC vs. CC     
  1. aCrude ORs were calculated with 2 × 2 cross-tabulation.
  2. bAdjusted ORs were obtained from binary logistic regression.
  3. OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.