Skip to main content

Table 4 Associations of SNPs with smoking status (ex-smokers vs. current smokers)

From: Association between Common Genetic Variants in the Opioid Pathway and Smoking Behaviors in Chinese Men

Model

Crude OR (95% CI)a

P value

Adjusted OR (95% CI)b

P value

rs1799971

    

Additive

1.00 (0.70–1.43)

0.96

0.99 (0.66–1.48)

0.97

AA vs. AG vs. GG

    

Dominant

0.90 (0.56–1.43)

0.66

0.87 (0.51–1.48)

0.62

AA vs. AG + GG

    

Recessive

1.41 (0.63–3.15)

0.40

1.40 (0.57–3.42)

0.46

AA + AG vs. GG

    

rs3786047

    

Additive

1.07 (0.66–1.74)

0.77

1.25 (0.71–2.19)

0.42

GG vs. GA vs. AA

    

Dominant

1.04 (0.62–1.75)

0.85

1.23 (0.68–2.22)

0.47

GG vs. GA + AA

    

Recessive

1.88 (0.16–21.07)

0.60

2.49 (0.14–43.07)

0.52

GG + GA vs. AA

    

rs1045280

    

Additive

0.98 (0.61–1.58)

0.95

1.21 (0.70–2.09)

0.48

TT vs. TC vs. CC

    

Dominant

0.98 (0.59–1.64)

0.96

1.21 (0.67–2.19)

0.50

TT vs. TC + CC

    

Recessive

0.94 (0.13–6.79)

0.95

1.48 (0.14–15.76)

0.74

TT + TC vs. CC

    

rs2036657

    

Additive

1.04 (0.65–1.66)

0.85

1.26 (0.73–2.16)

0.40

AA vs. AG vs. GG

    

Dominant

1.02 (0.61-1.70)

0.93

1.25 (0.69-2.26)

0.45

AA vs. AG + GG

    

Recessive

1.42 (0.23–8.66)

0.70

1.88 (0.21–16.24)

0.56

AA + AG vs. GG

    

rs3852209

    

Additive

0.75 (0.50–1.13)

0.17

0.72 (0.45–1.13)

0.15

CC vs. CT vs. TT

    

Dominant

0.63 (0.39–1.03)

0.06

0.54 (0.31–0.95)

0.03

CC vs. CT + TT

    

Recessive

1.27 (0.43–3.77)

0.66

1.75 (0.52–5.90)

0.36

CC + CT vs. TT

    

rs2278060

    

Additive

0.79 (0.53–1.17)

0.24

0.76 (0.49–1.20)

0.24

AA vs. AC vs. CC

    

Dominant

0.69 (0.43–1.12)

0.14

0.60 (0.35–1.03)

0.06

AA vs. AC + CC

    

Recessive

1.08 (0.38–3.07)

0.87

1.56 (0.48–5.03)

0.45

AA + AC vs. CC

    
  1. aCrude ORs were calculated with 2 × 2 cross-tabulation.
  2. bAdjusted ORs were obtained from binary logistic regression.
  3. OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.