Skip to main content

Table 1 Potential substrates of erotic stimulus processing

From: Does erotic stimulus presentation design affect brain activation patterns? Event-related vs. blocked fMRI designs

    

FA

PAR

OTC

INS

CIN

CER

BAG

AMY

HYP

THA

fMRI studies

contr

stim

des

          

   Arnow et al. 2002

spo

vid

block

√**

 

√**

√**

√**

√**

 

√**

 

   Beauregard et al. 2001

ntr

vid

block

 

 

 

 

   Ferretti et al. 2005

spo

img

event (3s)

  

  
 

spo

vid

block

  

   Gizewski et al. 2006

ntr

vid

block

 

 

   Hamann et al. 2004

ntr

img

block

 

√*

√*

√*

 

   Karama et al. 2002

ntr

vid

block

 

 

√*

√*

   Kim et al. 2006

ntr

vid

block

 

 

   

   Mouras et al. 2003

ntr

img

block

 

    

   Park et al. 2001

ntr

vid

block

 

 

  

   Stark et al. 2005

ntr

img

block

  

   

   Walter et al. 2008

ntr, emo

img

event (5s)

 

 

 

PET studies

             

   Redoute et al. 2000

ntr hum

img & vid

block

 

   Stoleru et al. 1999

ntr

vid

block

 

 

   
  1. FA: Frontal areas; PAR: Parietal regions; OTC: Occipitotemporal cortex; INS: Insular cortex; CIN: Cingulate gyrus; CER: Cerebellum; BAG: Basal ganglia; AMY: Amygdala; HYP: Hypothalamus; THA: Thalamus; contr: control condition; stim: stimulus material; des: fMRI design; hum: humorous; ntr: neutral; spo: sports; emo: emotional pictures; vid: video; img: still images; * significant activation observed only in males; ** penile turgidity-correlated activations