Skip to main content

Table 1 Overview regarding tasks employed in previous behavioral studies (asemantic vs. semantic processing containing different material)

From: Patterns of linguistic and numerical performance in aphasia

P

 

NUMBERS VS. LETTERS

TG

AS

Cognitive functions

N > L

N = L

N < L

 

Visual analysis

   

I

Automatized sequences

Cipolotti et al. [15], Thioux et al. [16]

Zamarian et al. [17]

 

Reading

 

Delazer & Benke [22]

 

Writing

Anderson et al. [18], Denes & Signorini [19], Delazer et al. [21], Delazer & Benke [22]

Cipolotti et al. [15], Delazer et al. [23]

 

Phonological working memory

Cipolotti et al. [15], Anderson et al. [18], Denes & Signorini [19], Starrfelt et al. [20], Jefferies et al. [25]

Domahs et al. [26]

 
 

NUMBERS VS. WORDS

 

Visual analysis

   

II

Automatized sequences

Cipolotti et al. [15], Domahs et al. [26]

Thioux et al. [16], Zamarian et al. [17], Delazer et al. [23]

 

Repetition

Bencini et al. [28], Cappelletti et al. [29], Semenza et al. [30]

 

Messina et al. [31]

Reading

Cipolotti et al. [15], Anderson et al. [18], Domahs et al. [26], Bencini et al. [28], Cappelletti et al. [29], Semenza et al. [30], Crutch & Warrington [32], Butterworth et al. [33]

Thioux et al. [16], Delazer & Benke [22], Rossor et al. [34], Bachoud-Lévi & Dupoux [35], Warrington [36]

Denes & Signorini [19], Messina et al. [31], Marangolo et al. [37], Basso & Beschin [38], Ochtrup et al. [39]

Writing

Thioux et al. [16], Anderson et al. [18], Delazer et al. [21], Delazer & Benke [22], Cappelletti et al. [29], Rossor et al. [34], Butterworth et al. [33]

Cipolotti et al. [15], Denes & Signorini [19], Delazer et al. [23]

Messina et al. [31], Basso & Beschin [38], Ochtrup et al. [39]

Morpho-lexical knowledge

Barber & Carreiras [40], Barber & Carreiras [41]

  

S

Semantic classification

Zamarian et al. [17]

 

Delazer et al. [23]

III

Semantic comparison

Thioux et al. [16], Crutch & Warrington [32], Cappelletti et al. [42], Cappelletti et al. [43]

 

Cipolotti et al. [15], Thioux et al. [16], Delazer & Benke [22]

Fact retrieval

  

Warrington [36]

  1. Note. Studies are listed according to the type of processing (P) [asemantic (AS) vs. semantic (S)] and stimulus material of tasks used in the study, and correspondingly grouped into three task groups (TG): I, II, and III. N > L: better numerical than linguistic performance, N = L: numerical similar to linguistic performance, N < L: better linguistic than numerical performance.