Skip to main content

Table 7 Results from the configural frequency analysis (CFA) for dissociation patterns regarding automatized sequences

From: Patterns of linguistic and numerical performance in aphasia

Dissociation patterns a-b

Sum of patients

CFA

Z

p

0-0

29a

3.572

< .0056

0-N

2b

−3.341

< .0056

0-L

0

−0.033

ns

N-0

14b

−3.572

< .0056

N-N

14a

3.341

< .0056

N-L

1

0.033

ns

L-0

0b

> −4

< .0056

L-N

0b

> −4

< .0056

L-L

0b

> −4

< .0056

  1. Note. Dissociation pattern a-b: a = direction of dissociation between automatized sequences of numbers vs. letters, b = direction of dissociation between automatized sequences of numbers vs. months; 0 = no dissociation, N = dissociation with better numerical performance, L = dissociation with better linguistic performance; apattern revealed as type or bantitype according to CFA [64], for all types and antitypes p < .0056 (Bonferroni-adjusted α).
Back to article page

Behavioral and Brain Functions

ISSN: 1744-9081

Contact us