Skip to main content

Table 1 Distance effect in proportion magnitude comparison for different presentation formats

From: Magnitude processing of symbolic and non-symbolic proportions: an fMRI study

Contrast

Brain region

MNI (x, y, z)

k

t

Fractions

RH inferior parietal lobule (hIP2)

43

− 42

53

31

5.43

RH inferior parietal lobule (hIP3)a

46

− 45

55

  

RH supplementary motor area

8

23

45

101

7.59

LH supplementary motor areaa

− 7

18

48

  

LH middle frontal gyrus

− 47

28

33

176

6.58

LH inferior frontal gyrusa

− 40

21

33

  

LH middle frontal gyrus

− 27

8

50

29

5.92

RH precentral gyrus

36

3

30

23

5.73

LH superior medial gyrus

− 7

33

40

11

5.66

RH inferior frontal gyrus

46

31

25

90

6.98

RH superior frontal gyrus

21

21

55

34

5.90

Dot patterns

RH superior parietal lobule (hIP3)

33

− 52

60

94

6.05

LH superior parietal lobule

− 30

− 57

63

73

6.37

RH superior frontal gyrus

26

3

63

41

6.54

LH anterior cingulate gyrus

− 15

26

28

13

5.97

RH calcarine gyrus

12

− 70

18

13

5.27

LH caudate

− 20

6

18

12

5.69

LH calcarine gyrus

− 17

− 75

10

1953

7.75

LH middle occipital gyrusa

− 42

− 80

0

  

LH cuneusa

− 2

− 75

18

  

RH inferior occipital gyrusa

43

− 75

− 8

  

Pie charts

RH middle occipital gyrus

28

− 75

33

2094

9.69

RH superior occipital gyrusa

26

− 75

38

  

RH inferior occipital gyrusa

43

− 75

− 5

  

RH inferior temporal gyrusa

46

− 80

− 3

  

RH inferior parietal lobule (hIP2)a

41

− 40

48

  

RH superior parietal lobule (hIP3)a

28

− 60

60

  

LH superior parietal lobule

− 22

− 65

63

247

6.62

LH inferior parietal lobule (hIP3)a

− 35

− 50

53

  

RH middle cingulate cortex

8

16

45

836

11.46

LH middle cingulate cortexa

− 5

18

45

  

RH precentral gyrus

46

6

28

532

9.32

RH inferior frontal gyrusa

48

28

25

  

RH insula

36

21

3

397

8.93

RH inferior frontal gyrusa

33

26

− 5

  

LH insula

− 32

18

3

204

9.36

LH inferior frontal gyrus

− 60

11

25

72

6.41

LH precentral gyrus

− 45

1

40

37

5.43

LH inferior occipital gyrus

− 42

− 75

− 10

1086

11.79

LH middle occipital gyrusa

− 42

− 85

8

  

LH superior occipital gyrusa

− 25

− 80

25

  

LH calcarine gyrus

− 15

− 72

10

706

8.68

RH calcarine gyrusa

16

− 67

13

  

Decimals

RH inferior parietal lobule (hIP2)

48

− 40

45

95

5.96

RH postcentral gyrusa

43

− 32

60

  

LH inferior parietal lobule (hIP3)

− 37

− 52

58

21

5.41

LH superior parietal lobulea

− 30

− 57

63

  

LH inferior parietal lobule

− 27

− 45

48

12

5.45

LH supramarginal gyrus

− 60

− 45

30

24

5.59

LH lingual gyrus

− 15

− 55

− 10

468

7.38

LH fusiform gyursa

− 37

− 37

− 23

  

RH inferior temporal gyrus

51

− 62

− 10

50

5.83

RH fusiform gyrusa

41

− 57

− 13

  

LH inferior occipital gyrus

− 45

− 75

− 13

344

7.60

LH middle occipital gyrusa

− 50

− 75

− 3

  

LH middle temporal gyrusa

− 52

− 70

13

  

LH Superior temporal gyrus

− 42

− 35

3

60

7.05

LH middle temporal gyrus

− 55

− 55

15

45

5.72

LH superior temporal gyrusa

− 57

− 45

15

  

RH temporal pole

51

16

− 23

15

5.89

LH middle temporal gyrus

− 57

− 37

8

14

5.50

LH precentral gyrus

− 40

− 2

40

59

5.81

LH inferior frontal gyrus

− 45

28

− 3

47

5.56

LH inferior frontal gyrus

− 42

13

15

29

6.66

RH superior frontal gyrus

21

− 15

75

25

6.21

RH precentral gyrus

43

− 17

58

16

5.32

LH Middle frontal gyrus

− 45

26

40

16

5.81

LH middle frontal gyrus

− 35

21

30

12

5.71

LH posterior insula

− 30

− 20

13

28

5.72

LH insula

− 35

21

3

10

5.17

LH cuneus

− 2

− 77

18

742

7.51

LH calcarine gyrusa

− 15

− 72

13

  

LH superior occipital gyrusa

− 12

− 80

23

  

RH lingual gyrus

18

− 47

− 3

43

6.60

LH putamen

− 30

− 12

− 8

18

5.71

LH paracentral lobule

− 10

− 32

75

13

5.11

  1. Activations were thresholded at a whole-brain FWE-corrected p value of < .05 with a cluster size of k = 10 voxels and reported only when they remained significant following FWE-correction for multiple comparisons at the cluster-level at p < .05 FWE. Cerebellar activations are not reported due to incomplete coverage of the cerebellum depending on individual head size
  2. k cluster size; LH left hemisphere; MNI Montreal Neurological Institute; RH right hemisphere; t t value
  3. aMinor maximum