Skip to main content

Table 2 Model-comparison analysis for LHT: Timing accuracy and precision

From: Evidence for impulsivity in the Spontaneously Hypertensive Rat drawn from complementary response-withholding tasks

 

Parameters varied across strains

Accuracy

θ and δ

Only θ

Only δ

None

   Number of free parameters (k)

7

5

5

3

   ΔAICc

0.5

0

45.8

65.1

Precision

w and c

Only w

Only c

None

   Number of free parameters (k)

7

5

5

3

   ΔAICc

-7.5

0

24.7

23.7

  1. Note. AICc for each model was calculated as AICc (model) = 2k + n ln(RSS/n) + [2k (k + 1)/(n - k - 1)], where k is the number of free parameters (3 strains × parameters varied + parameters not varied + 1 variance parameter) and n is the total number of observations (18 rats × 8 target times - 16 empty cells = 128). ΔAICc is the difference between AICc of each model and AICc of the selected model; ΔAICc of the selected model is, thus, zero. Some models with lower indices were not selected because they did not improve the account by at least 10 points.