Maternal behavior in transgenic mice with reduced fibroblast growth factor receptor function in gonadotropin-releasing hormone neurons
© Brooks et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 13 March 2012
Accepted: 2 September 2012
Published: 5 September 2012
Fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) and their receptors (FGFRs) are necessary for the proper development of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) neurons, which are key activators of the hypothalamo-pituitary-gonadal axis. Transgenic mice that have the targeted expression of a dominant negative FGFR (dnFGFR) in GnRH neurons (dnFGFR mice) have a 30% decrease of GnRH neurons. Additionally, only 30–40% of the pups born to the transgenic dams survive to weaning age. These data raised the possibility that FGFR defects in GnRH neurons could adversely affect maternal behavior via novel mechanisms.
We first determined if defective maternal behavior in dnFGFR mothers may contribute to poor pup survival by measuring pup retrieval and a battery of maternal behaviors in primiparous control (n = 10–12) and dnFGFR (n = 13–14) mothers. Other endocrine correlates of maternal behaviors, including plasma estradiol levels and hypothalamic pro-oxyphysin and GnRH transcript levels were also determined using enzyme-linked immunoassay and quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, respectively.
Maternal behaviors (% time crouching with pups, time off pups but not feeding, time feeding, and total number of nesting bouts) were not significantly different in dnFGFR mice. However, dnFGFR dams were more likely to leave their pups scattered and took significantly longer to retrieve each pup compared to control dams. Further, dnFGFR mothers had significantly lower GnRH transcripts and circulating E2, but normal pro-oxyphysin transcript levels.
Overall, this study suggests a complex scenario in which a GnRH system compromised by reduced FGF signaling leads to not only suboptimal reproductive physiology, but also suboptimal maternal behavior.
KeywordsGnRH Maternal Behavior Fibroblast Growth Factor Estradiol Pup Retrieval
Maternal care is an essential component of offspring survival in all mammals. In mice, pups are born hairless, blind and incapable of regulating body temperature . Without adequate nourishment and protection from the mother, these newborn pups would die. The critical components of maternal care in mice include lactation and behaviors such as nesting, pup retrieval, and crouching over the pups [2, 3].
Neurons that synthesize gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) are the primary hormonal activators of the reproductive axis in all vertebrates. Reduced GnRH leads to profound fertility deficits in humans and other animals [4–6]. However, a role of GnRH neurons in maternal behavior, which is a critical facet of reproductive success, has never been examined. Our laboratory has generated a transgenic mouse line in which the expression of a dominant-negative fibroblast growth factor receptor (dnFGFR) has been targeted to GnRH neurons using a rat GnRH promoter . Because GnRH neurons require FGF signaling for proper development [7, 8], these mice suffer a significant reduction in GnRH neurons after birth . A serendipitous discovery is the difficulty involved in propagating the dnFGFR mice (Tsai, unpublished data). This is in part due to their documented smaller litter size and shorter reproductive lifespan , but may also be due to compromised maternal behavior and offspring survival. These mice are useful for examining the connection between the maternal behavior and the GnRH system since they harbor only GnRH neuron-specific defects, thereby eliminating confounding effects originating from other tissues. In a sense, this model represents a condition in which the GnRH system is significantly compromised but not completely incapacitated. Another potential mouse model with a specific loss of the GnRH system is the hpg mouse harboring a deletion mutation on the GnRH gene . However, this mouse is sterile and cannot undergo pregnancy or exhibit natural maternal behavior.
This study investigates maternal behavior of dnFGFR mice, a model characterized by reduced GnRH neuron number and difficult offspring propagation. We find specific aspects of maternal behavior are in fact disrupted in dnFGFR dams. We further examined if deficits in two hormones involved in lactation and maternal behavior, oxytocin (OT) mRNA and circulating estradiol (E2) , could contribute to these behavioral disruptions. Overall, our studies suggest a novel scenario in which a GnRH system compromised by reduced FGF signaling can lead to not only suboptimal reproductive physiology, but also suboptimal maternal behavior.
dnFGFR mice were generated by Tsai et al. (2005). These mice have the expression of a dnFGFR cassette targeted specifically to GnRH neurons using a rat GnRH promoter, thereby compromising the ability of GnRH neurons to respond to FGF signaling. As previously described by Tsai et al. (2005), dnFGFR mice were generated on a background of C57BL/6J × DBA/2JF1. These animals were then bred to homozygosity to maximize dnFGFR expression. Non-transgenic animals resulting from heterozygous crosses were used as controls to ensure the same genetic background as the transgenic mice. All animals were kept on a 12 h light (from 0800 to 2000), and 12 h dark cycle and fed water and rodent chow ad libitum. All animal procedures complied with the protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the University of Colorado.
To determine the breeding success of control or dnFGFR mice, we evaluated the percentage of pups born by control (n = 6) or dnFGFR (n = 22) dams that survive to weaning age. Percent pup survival on postnatal day (PD) 21 (weaning) was calculated for each dam’s first three litters. Pup survival to PD1 was calculated in a separate cohort for control (n = 4) and dnFGFR (n = 6) litters. We also investigated pup weights on the day of birth (PD0), PD1 and PD2 (n = 29 and n = 6 for pups born to control and dnFGFR dams, respectively).
Maternal behavior and pup retrieval test
We performed a maternal behavior assay and the pup retrieval test to determine if maternal behavior is impacted by disruptions in the GnRH system. For all behavioral observations, primiparous control (n = 10–12) or dnFGFR (n = 13–14) females at 3–6 months of age were mated to control males. This mating scheme generated two offspring genotypes: heterozygous dnFGFR (by dnFGFR dams) and control pups (by control dams). Our observations showed that heterozygous dnFGFR and control pups did not survive differently under the care of the same dam. When heterozygous females were mated with control males, 53.1 ± 7.05% (n = 3 dams, 9 ± 2.5 pups/litter) of the offspring that survived to weaning age were heterozygous dnFGFR pups, with the remainder being control pups, a ratio consistent with Mendelian genetics. These data suggest differences in pup survival would likely come from the dams, not the pups themselves. The pregnant females were singly housed 3–10 days prior to parturition. The maternal behavior assay and pup retrieval test were performed between the hours 2100 and 2300, and given the high mortality rate of pups born by dnFGFR mothers (see Results section), were only performed within 24 hours of birth (PD0). Multiple days of testing were not possible due to the early mortality of some pups. During the maternal behavioral assay, the dam with her pups were videotaped undisturbed in the dam’s home cage for an hour. The cage was illuminated by one 40-W red light bulb suspended above the cage. These videotapes were analyzed by an observer blind to the identity of the animals and scored for the following parameters: percent time crouching over pups (nursing/crouching/resting), percent time off nest (not in contact with pups), percent time feeding, total number of nesting bouts (moving nest material towards nest or rearranging the current nest material) and the location of the pups in relation to the nest immediately before and during testing.
Immediately after the maternal behavior assay, the pup retrieval test was conducted for a total duration of 15 minutes. In this test, the dam was removed from the cage and three of her pups were placed in three different corners . The remaining pups were counted and put in a separate cage. The dam was then returned to the center of the home cage and the latencies to sniff one of the pups, retrieve each of the three pups, and crouch over them for longer than a minute were recorded. The total duration of crouching over the pups and the number of nesting bouts were also scored. If a dam failed to complete the retrieval in 15 minutes, a score of 900 s was assigned. Following the retrieval test, the pups were weighed and the presence of milk in the pups’ stomachs was recorded. Dams were subsequently sacrificed by decapitation and total RNA from their brains was isolated for quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). Trunk blood was also collected for an E2 enzyme immunoassay (EIA).
Reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR)
In addition to adequate maternal care, pup survival also depends on milk production and ejection, the latter of which requires the presence of OT. As a control to verify that milk was available to pups born to dnFGFR dams, we examined the presence of milk in the pups’ stomach and quantified the levels of pro-oxyphysin transcript in the hypothalamus by qPCR. Because dnFGFR mice have fewer GnRH neurons, we also performed GnRH qPCR to determine whether GnRH transcript was reduced. Following the retrieval test, dams were sacrificed by decapitation and the brains dissected and blocked (n = 6 control and n = 7 dnFGFR dams). The preoptic area (POA) represents the brain region between the posterior borders of olfactory bulbs and the optic chiasm. The hypothalamus (HYPO) represents the brain region between the optic chiasm and caudal mammillary body. These tissue blocks were immediately placed on dry ice and kept frozen at −70°C until processing. Total RNA was isolated with TRIzol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. One μg of total RNA was used for the synthesis of cDNA using the Superscript III First-Strand cDNA Synthesis kit (Invitrogen). Real-time qPCR of GnRH and pro-oxyphysin transcripts was performed using the Fast Start DNA Master SYBR Green I kit (Roche Pharmaceuticals, Indianapolis, IN), as previously described . Absolute quantification was performed using vectors containing the full-length mouse GnRH or pro-oxyphysin cDNA as standards. Primer sequences were: 5′CTGCTGACTGTGTGTTTGGAAGG (forward) and 5′CCTGGCTTCCTCTTCAATCA (reverse) for GnRH, and 5′-CAGGGCGAAGGCAGGTAGTT (forward) and 5′-GTCTCGCTTGCTGCCTGCTT (reverse) for pro-oxyphysin. All amplifications were performed for 40 cycles with annealing temperature of 60°C. Following data acquisition, data from the POA and HYPO blocks were combined to determine the total hypothalamic content of pro-oxyphysin or GnRH mRNA. These data were presented as “hypothalamic” in the Results section.
E2 enzyme linked immunoassay (EIA)
To determine whether disruptions in the GnRH system impact circulating E2, we performed E2 EIA on plasma samples. Following the pup retrieval test, dams were sacrificed and trunk blood collected into heparinized tubes for plasma isolation (n = 4 control and n = 6 dnFGFR dams). Plasma E2 was measured using a commercial EIA kit validated for the mouse (Cayman Chemical Company, Ann Arbor, MI) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Two serially diluted doses were measured for each sample using a BioTek SynergyTM HT plate reader and Gen5 software. Samples with serial dilutions not parallel to the standard were excluded from the analysis. The intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation were 13% and 8.2%, respectively, and the limit of detection was 19 pg/ml.
Fisher’s exact test was used to analyze the differences in the percentages of dams with scattered pups and dams with pups scattered that were also non-retrievers. Chi-square analysis was used to analyze pups with milk in their stomachs. Friedman’s test was used to determine whether pup survival to weaning improved with successive litters within each genotype. Two-way repeated measures ANOVA followed by the Holm-Sidak multiple comparison test was used to analyze pup weights and the latency to retrieve pups. All other data were analyzed using the Student’s t-test or the Mann–Whitney Rank Sum test. SigmaPlot v.11 (Systat Software Inc.) was used for all statistical analyses. If subjects were two standard deviations from the mean they were considered statistical outliers for that test and were removed from that analysis. Data were considered significant when p < 0.05.
Maternal behavior and pup retrieval
Other behavioral assessments during the pup retrieval test
Latency to sniff
Latency to crouch
(mean ± SEM)
(mean ± SEM)
(mean ± SEM)
(mean ± SEM)
3.80 ± 0.83
236.3 ± 23.06
456.3 ± 54.77
6.3 ± 1.27
4.92 ± 1.30
491.14 ± 93.10
351.8 ± 90.59
4.2 ± 0.80
qPCR of pro-oxyphysin and GnRH transcripts
To determine whether disruptions in the GnRH system impact the levels of estradiol, we performed an E2 EIA on plasma collected from post-partum control and dnFGFR dams. dnFGFR mothers had significantly lower circulating E2 than controls (Figure 5D; p = 0.038).
In this study, we provide novel evidence that defects in the GnRH system may reduce reproductive success through mechanisms unrelated to reduced fertility. Namely, a GnRH system compromised by FGF signaling deficiency disrupts important pup-gathering and retrieval behaviors, thereby contributing to reduced offspring care. Although a direct causal link has not been established, this reduced care may contribute to the reduced survival of pups born to dnFGFR dams. The basis of the behavioral defect is presently unclear, but two mechanisms are possible. The first is supported by indirect evidence and posits that a disrupted GnRH system may directly and adversely affect the maternal behavior neurocircuits upon which it impinges. The second is that the disrupted maternal behavior in dnFGFR mice may be secondary to reduced circulating E2. These two possibilities are discussed below.
The first possibility is that the disruption of the GnRH system directly impacts the maternal circuits. GnRH neurons are predominantly found in the medial POA of the hypothalamus (MPA) [12–14]. This heterogeneous region rostral to the optic chiasm is central to rodent reproductive behaviors, including maternal behavior. At present, the precise neural connections linking the GnRH system and maternal behavior neurocircuits are unclear. What is clear is that a number of behavioral neurocircuits such as the dopaminergic, serotonergic, olfactory and oxytocinergic systems have all been found to play a role in maternal behaviors, and each of these systems has projections to and from the MPA [3, 15–19]. Since GnRH neurons are located in the MPA and express receptors for dopamine, serotonin, and OT, it is possible that the GnRH system and the MPA neurocircuits mediating maternal behavior share a number of common input and output projections [17, 20, 21]. Supporting this notion, GnRH was shown to act as a neuromodulator by modifying the responses of cultured MPA neurons to norepinephrine and serotonin . Further, mapping studies with a transneuronal tracer expressed specifically in GnRH neurons reported connections between GnRH neurons and numerous brain regions important for maternal behavior, including the nucleus accumbens, bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, amygdala, septum and numerous hypothalamic nuclei . These regions also express type I GnRH receptor , which is a G protein-coupled receptor acting primarily through the G protein, Gq/11. Interestingly, forebrain Gq/11 knockout mothers failed to retrieve pups to the nest and had no pup survive to weaning age . These results paralleled our current findings and suggest a decreased activation of the GnRH receptor may adversely impact maternal care through direct or transsynaptic alterations of the maternal behavior circuits.
In addition to having reduced GnRH neuron number, transcript and peptide, dnFGFR mice also have aberrant FGF signaling in GnRH neurons . Because FGF signaling activates a variety of signal transduction pathways which include phospholipase Cγ, extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK), and the phosphoinositide 3-kinase/Akt pathways, the consequent disruption in intracellular signaling can directly alter the biology of GnRH neurons . This may render GnRH neurons less able to respond to afferents that rely upon them to convey signals to the maternal circuitries. For example, olfactory cues are important instigators for maternal behavior in mice [28–31]. Sensory afferents from the olfactory system have been shown to mediate maternal behaviors and also indirectly connect with GnRH neurons [23, 32, 33]. In this respect, the GnRH system may serve as an intermediary or modulator of olfactory projections to maternal circuitries in the MPA . Disruption of GnRH neuronal biology as the result of FGF signaling deficiency could then lead to defects in this modulatory or connective role.
An alternate hypothesis is that a deficiency in E2 in dnFGFR mice might be the cause of maternal behavior deficits. The reduction of GnRH neurons, transcript and peptide content in dnFGFR mice may lead to reduced gonadotropins and ultimately circulating E2. Several lines of evidence support the importance of E2 in rat maternal behavior [34–36]. For example, direct infusions of E2 into the MPA elicit rat maternal behaviors . Additionally, MPA maternal behavior circuits express abundant estrogen receptor alpha (ERα), implicating a direct influence of E2. The story has been less clear in mice. A study supports a direct link between maternal behaviors and estrogen signaling by demonstrating that ERα knockout (KO) virgin female mice exhibit impaired pup retrieval and increased infanticide . However, other evidence suggests that pup-oriented maternal behaviors in virgin female mice are independent of estrogens . Further, Stolzenberg and Rissman (2011) have shown repeated pup exposure is the most important factor in maternal behavior and that estrogens play only a facilitatory role . Given the controversial role of E2 in mouse maternal behavior, we favor the hypothesis that deficient maternal behavior in dnFGFR mice is more causally linked to a compromised GnRH system than reduced E2.
We describe here an interesting phenomenon in which reduced GnRH is coupled to compromised maternal behaviors. A disrupted GnRH system thus adversely impacts not only fertility, but may also impact offspring survival. Given that hypothalamic OT mRNA and milk availability are normal in dnFGFR dams, lactational defects are unlikely the cause of poor survival in pups born to dnFGFR dams. Rather, disrupted maternal behavior that reduces pup gathering into the nest is more likely a contributor to poor pup survival. We have proposed two mechanisms that could cause this disrupted maternal behavior in dnFGFR mice: (1) suboptimal GnRH connectivity with maternal neurocircuits as a result of decreased FGF signaling and (2) reduced E2 in dnFGFR mice leading to impaired maternal neurocircuits. Regardless of the mechanism, this study establishes that a functional GnRH system guided by FGF signaling is critical for maternal behaviors and potentially offspring survival.
This work was supported by NIH grant R01 HD042634 to PST and the Endocrine Society Summer Fellowship to LRB.
- Crawley J: What’s wrong with my mouse. 2000, Wiley-Liss, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Shoji H, Kato K: Maternal behavior of primiparous females in inbred strains of mice: a detailed descriptive analysis. Physiol Behav. 2006, 89: 320-328.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Numan M, Insel TR: The neurobiology of parental behavior. 2003, Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Chan YM, de Guillebon A, Lang-Muritano M, Plummer L, Cerrato F, Tsiaras S, Gaspert A, Lavoie HB, Wu CH, Crowley WF: GNRH1 mutations in patients with idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009, 106: 11703-11708.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mason AJ, Hayflick JS, Zoeller RT, Young WS, Phillips HS, Nikolics K, Seeburg PH: A deletion truncating the gonadotropin-releasing hormone gene is responsible for hypogonadism in the hpg mouse. Science. 1986, 234: 1366-1371.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bouligand J, Ghervan C, Tello JA, Brailly-Tabard S, Salenave S, Chanson P, Lombes M, Millar RP, Guiochon-Mantel A, Young J: Isolated familial hypogonadotropic hypogonadism and a GNRH1 mutation. N Engl J Med. 2009, 360: 2742-2748.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tsai PS, Moenter SM, Postigo HR, El Majdoubi M, Pak TR, Gill JC, Paruthiyil S, Werner S, Weiner RI: Targeted expression of a dominant-negative fibroblast growth factor (FGF) receptor in gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) neurons reduces FGF responsiveness and the size of GnRH neuronal population. Mol Endocrinol. 2005, 19: 225-236.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dode C, Levilliers J, Dupont JM, De Paepe A, Le Du N, Soussi-Yanicostas N, Coimbra RS, Delmaghani S, Compain-Nouaille S, Baverel F: Loss-of-function mutations in FGFR1 cause autosomal dominant Kallmann syndrome. Nat Genet. 2003, 33: 463-465.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pfaff D, Waters E, Khan Q, Zhang X, Numan M: Minireview: estrogen receptor-initiated mechanisms causal to mammalian reproductive behaviors. Endocrinology. 2011, 152: 1209-1217.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Champagne FA, Curley JP, Keverne EB, Bateson PP: Natural variations in postpartum maternal care in inbred and outbred mice. Physiol Behav. 2007, 91: 325-334.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brooks LR, Chung WC, Tsai PS: Abnormal hypothalamic oxytocin system in fibroblast growth factor 8-deficient mice. Endocrine. 2010, 38: 174-180.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Renaud LP, Day TA, Ferguson AV: CNS regulation of reproduction: peptidergic mechanisms. Brain Res Bull. 1984, 12: 181-186.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Witkin JW, Paden CM, Silverman AJ: The luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) systems in the rat brain. Neuroendocrinology. 1982, 35: 429-438.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Franklin KBJ, Paxinos G: The mouse brain in stereotaxic coordinates. 2007, Academic Press, New York, 3Google Scholar
- Leckman JF, Herman AE: Maternal behavior and developmental psychopathology. Biol Psychiatry. 2002, 51: 27-43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Flannelly KJ, Kemble ED, Blanchard DC, Blanchard RJ: Effects of septal-forebrain lesions on maternal aggression and maternal care. Behav Neural Biol. 1986, 45: 17-30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gammie SC: Current models and future directions for understanding the neural circuitries of maternal behaviors in rodents. Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev. 2005, 4: 119-135.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Calamandrei G, Keverne EB: Differential expression of Fos protein in the brain of female mice dependent on pup sensory cues and maternal experience. Behav Neurosci. 1994, 108: 113-120.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lerch-Haner JK, Frierson D, Crawford LK, Beck SG, Deneris ES: Serotonergic transcriptional programming determines maternal behavior and offspring survival. Nat Neurosci. 2008, 11: 1001-1003.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Li S, Pelletier G: Involvement of serotonin in the regulation of GnRH gene expression in the male rat brain. Neuropeptides. 1995, 29: 21-25.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Numan M, Stolzenberg DS: Medial preoptic area interactions with dopamine neural systems in the control of the onset and maintenance of maternal behavior in rats. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2009, 30: 46-64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pan JT, Kow LM, Pfaff DW: Modulatory actions of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone on electrical activity of preoptic neurons in brain slices. Neuroscience. 1988, 27: 623-628.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Boehm U, Zou Z, Buck LB: Feedback loops link odor and pheromone signaling with reproduction. Cell. 2005, 123: 683-695.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Albertson AJ, Navratil A, Mignot M, Dufourny L, Cherrington B, Skinner DC: Immunoreactive GnRH type I receptors in the mouse and sheep brain. J Chem Neuroanat. 2008, 35: 326-333.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Millar RP, Lu Z-L, Pawson AJ, Flanagan CA, Morgan K, Maudsley SR: Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptors. Endocr Rev. 2004, 25: 235-275.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wettschureck N, Moers A, Hamalainen T, Lemberger T, Schutz G, Offermanns S: Heterotrimeric G proteins of the Gq/11 family are crucial for the induction of maternal behavior in mice. Mol Cell Biol. 2004, 24: 8048-8054.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Reuss B, von Bohlen und Halbach O: Fibroblast growth factors and their receptors in the central nervous system. Cell Tissue Res. 2003, 313: 139-157.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Belluscio L, Gold GH, Nemes A, Axel R: Mice deficient in G(olf) are anosmic. Neuron. 1998, 20: 69-81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gandelman R, Zarrow MX, Denenberg VH: Reproductive and maternal performance in the mouse following removal of the olfactory bulbs. J Reprod Fertil. 1972, 28: 453-456.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gandelman R, Zarrow MX, Denenberg VH, Myers M: Olfactory bulb removal eliminates maternal behavior in the mouse. Science. 1971, 171: 210-211.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zarrow MX, Gandelman R, Denenberg VH: Lack of nest building and maternal behavior in the mouse following olfactory bulb removal. Horm Behav. 1971, 2: 227-238.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Samuelsen CL, Meredith M: Categorization of biologically relevant chemical signals in the medial amygdala. Brain Res. 2009, 1263: 33-42.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dulac C, Torello AT: Molecular detection of pheromone signals in mammals: from genes to behaviour. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003, 4: 551-562.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pedersen CA: Oxytocin control of maternal behavior. Regulation by sex steroids and offspring stimuli. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1997, 807: 126-145.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Champagne FA, Weaver IC, Diorio J, Sharma S, Meaney MJ: Natural variations in maternal care are associated with estrogen receptor alpha expression and estrogen sensitivity in the medial preoptic area. Endocrinology. 2003, 144: 4720-4724.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Numan M, Rosenblatt JS, Komisaruk BR: Medial preoptic area and onset of maternal behavior in the rat. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1977, 91: 146-164.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Champagne FA, Weaver IC, Diorio J, Dymov S, Szyf M, Meaney MJ: Maternal care associated with methylation of the estrogen receptor-alpha1b promoter and estrogen receptor-alpha expression in the medial preoptic area of female offspring. Endocrinology. 2006, 147: 2909-2915.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ogawa S, Eng V, Taylor J, Lubahn DB, Korach KS, Pfaff DW: Roles of estrogen receptor-alpha gene expression in reproduction-related behaviors in female mice. Endocrinology. 1998, 139: 5070-5081.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stolzenberg DS, Rissman EF: Oestrogen-independent, experience-induced maternal behaviour in female mice. J Neuroendocrinol. 2011, 23: 345-354.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.