Skip to main content

Excitability, synaptic balance, and addiction: The homeostatic dynamics of ionotropic glutamatergic receptors in VTA after cocaine exposure

Abstract

Glutamatergic AMPA and NMDA receptors in the ventral tegmental area (VTA) are central for cocaine first exposure and posterior craving maintenance. However, the exact rules that coordinate the synaptic dynamics of these receptors in dopaminergic VTA neurons and behavioral outcomes are poorly understood. Additionally, synaptic homeostatic plasticity is present in response to chronic excitability changes in neuronal circuits, adjusting the strength of synapses to stabilize the firing rate. Despite having correspondent mechanisms, little is known about the relationship between continuous cocaine exposure and homeostatic synaptic changes in the VTA neurons. Here, we assess the role of homeostatic mechanisms in the neurobiology of cocaine addiction by providing a brief overview of the parallels between cocaine-induced synaptic potentiation and long-term synaptic adaptations, focusing on the regulation of GluA1- and GluN1- containing receptors.

Introduction

Dopaminergic projections originated in the ventral tegmental area (VTA) are critical for reward learning and, consequently, drug abuse behaviors [5, 19, 23]. Animal models of cocaine addiction are characterized by compulsive drug-seeking and drug-taking even after prolonged periods of withdrawal [4, 11]. A central hypothesis is that these craving phenotypes reflect greater incentive motivation for the drug and associated stimuli [21] mediated by the potentiation of glutamatergic synapses on VTA dopamine neurons [13]. For example, VTA dopamine neurons exhibit transient NMDA receptor (NMDAR)-dependent increases in AMPA receptor (AMPAR)-mediated currents following either single or repeated cocaine injections [2, 26]. Similarly, cocaine has been shown to facilitate the experimental induction of long-term potentiation (LTP) and enhance the responsiveness of dopamine neurons to AMPA administration [29]. Despite the broad knowledge on these mechanisms, the scientific literature does not provide details on how this synaptic reinforcement can lead to excitatory over-potentiation of the reward circuitry, which in turn may trigger synaptic homeostatic mechanisms [24].

The homeostatic regulation of synapses is a extensively studied process [17], believed as necessary for the adequate development and function of neuronal networks [25]. It is defined as a negative feedback response mechanism to chronically elevated or reduced activity in a neural circuit, where individual neurons adapt to these changes by modifying their synaptic excitability threshold. It can be achieved through adjustments in ionotropic glutamatergic receptors synaptic modulation [7, 18]. During homeostatic regulation, AMPAR and NMDAR numbers at the postsynaptic surface are scaled down- or upwardly in response to activity overexcitation or inhibition, respectively, presumably via changing trafficking processes, including insertion and internalization of the receptors [27].

Homeostatic mechanisms have been shown to regulate many aspects of brain function by the interaction with other types of plasticity [1, 16], and to influence the pathophysiology of neuropsychiatric and neurologic disorders [9]. However, the role of synaptic homeostasis in substance abuse and addiction was not yet investigated. This article considers recent evidence on the influence of synaptic potentiation and subsequent homeostatic regulation in the VTA into behavioral outcomes of cocaine craving after chronic drug exposure. We use the regulation of GluA1- and GluN1-containing glutamatergic channels as a framework to examine the interactions of these two types of synaptic plasticity and their influence on craving behavior.

GluA1/GluN1 dynamics during cocaine exposure, re-exposure, and withdrawal

NMDARs and AMPARs are necessary for the acute cocaine-induced synaptic potentiation in VTA DA cells. By preventing the synthesis of the AMPAR subunits GluA1 or GluA2 [8], or the NMDAR subunit GluN1 [30] in cells expressing the DA transporter, cocaine-induced reinforcement can be prevented in glutamatergic synapses of the VTA DA cells. Interestingly, however, at the behavioral level these mutations are unable to change the locomotor sensitization following repeated cocaine exposure in mice.

Additionally, GluA1-containing AMPARs were shown to have a singular pattern of expression after cocaine exposure: they are up-regulated after acute, but not chronic, cocaine self-administration; however, the withdrawal period is able to induce GluA1-AMPARs up-regulation again [3, 14, 15]. Moreover, the expression of this subunit is related to cocaine intake motivation, as rats transiently over-expressing GluA1-AMPARs were shown to have increased craving in the progressive ratio habituation. In this paradigm, animals are trained to self-administer cocaine, but the number of necessary lever presses exponentially increases with each cocaine release. When analyzing the breaking point parameter, defined by the highest ratio of responses per injection achieved before a 1 h-period when no further injections were earned, rats overexpressing GluA1-AMPARs much took longer to reach this point when compared to controls [3].

This state-dependent expression pattern of GluA1-AMPARs was shown to be regulated by GluN1-containing NMDARs. By using a viral-mediated expression of a dominant-negative GluN1 subunit in VTA, it was demonstrated that the absence of this NMDA unit blocks the increase in GluA1-AMPARs after chronic cocaine intake [12]. Nevertheless, the behavioral effects of inhibiting GluN1 expression are somewhat unexpected. GluN1-negative animals have attenuated locomotor sensitization after withdrawal [30] and are unable to the reinstatement of cocaine-conditioned place preference [8]; however, transient absence of GluN1 applied to the VTA during chronic cocaine self-administration paradoxically enhances cocaine-seeking behavior [12]. After withdrawal, these rats take longer to reach the breaking point and earn more cocaine injections when compared to controls. Extinction of this behavior was also impaired, and the reinstatement of the drug-paired lever response was facilitated.

These counterintuitive results could only be explained after studying the influence of homeostatic regulations due to the continuous change in neuronal excitability induced by the transient manipulation of GluN1-NMDARs in VTA. In fact, it was demonstrated that transient GluN1 inactivation for 3weeks enhanced AMPAR-mediated locomotor activity and membrane expression of glutamate receptor subunits, including GluA1. The overexpression of these AMPA channels, in turn, drove an increased motivation for cocaine in a progressive ratio testing and kept elevated the cocaine-seeking behavior elicited in both extinction and cocaine-primed reinstatement, even after 3–5 weeks of withdrawal [12]. This body of evidence suggests that the homeostatic regulation of AMPAR is able to modulate cocaine craving during chronic cocaine exposure and withdrawal.

The role of homeostatic plasticity

These results were interpreted as a specific explanation for the observed cocaine-seeking after transient GluN1-NMDARs inactivation. However, we believe these results also indicate that cocaine-induced plasticity may induce synaptic scaling processes in the VTA at more general conditions. For example, homeostatic plasticity mechanisms have been shown to modulate the pathophysiology of some neurologic and neuropsychiatric disorders, such as intellectual disability [22], Rett syndrome [20], schizophrenia [6], and Alzheimer’s disease [28].

Moreover, when investigating the role of VTA in a social defeat stress model of depression, it was observed that VTA dopaminergic neurons of depression-resilient mice display enhanced inhibitory currents as a homeostatic response to this behavioral challenge [10]. The study also demonstrated that by artificially activating of VTA DA neurons in depression-susceptible animals, self-tuning homeostatic compensations could be triggered, changing the behavior. Thus, by naturally or experimentally establishing homeostatic balance in VTA dopaminergic neurons, they become more stable in response to environmental perturbations.

When we look at cocaine-induced GluA1 plasticity in VTA neurons, after organizing by periods of drug intake and withdrawal (Fig. 1), we can observe a stereotypical process of AMPAR homeostatic regulation driven by enhanced excitation (chronic cocaine administration), followed by adaptation to decreased excitation (withdrawal). The acute intake of cocaine leads to short-term synaptic potentiation and enhanced expression of GluA1 proteins. However, after chronic intake of cocaine, GluA1 expression is comparable to that of controls, indicating a homeostatic response to continuous self-administration of the drug. Furthermore, during cocaine withdrawal, when the overall excitability is decreased, GluA1 levels rise again. These compensatory dynamics of AMPAR are consistent with homeostatic synaptic processes [24].

Fig. 1
figure1

Schematics of the homeostatic-like characteristics of AMPAR-GluA1 dynamics after cocaine self-administration

Conclusions

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report suggesting a connection between synaptic scaling processes and the physiological mechanisms of cocaine addiction in the VTA. Unquestionably, homeostatic regulations of VTA neurons are not the only responsible for craving behavior, as classic potentiation mechanisms and context reinforcement are also part of this process. In fact, most of the aforementioned cocaine-induced AMPAR/NMDAR plasticity takes place in VTA after cocaine self-administration, but not with passive yoked infusion, indicating a protagonist of learning and memory mechanisms. However, these recent results show that the contributions of synaptic homeostatic scaling in cocaine addiction must be further investigated. We believe such discussion would advance the understanding of homeostatic plasticity in behaviorally relevant in vivo models of addiction and provide further insight into the physiological underpinnings of compulsion and craving.

Availability of data and materials

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

References

  1. 1.

    Abbott LF, Nelson SB. Synaptic plasticity: taming the beast. Nat Neurosci. 2000;3:1178–83. https://doi.org/10.1038/81453.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Borgland SL. Acute and chronic cocaine-induced potentiation of synaptic strength in the ventral tegmental area: electrophysiological and behavioral correlates in individual rats. J Neurosci. 2004;24:7482–90. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1312-04.2004.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Choi KH, Edwards S, Graham DL, Larson EB, Whisler KN, Simmons D, et al. Reinforcement-related regulation of AMPA glutamate receptor subunits in the ventral tegmental area enhances motivation for cocaine. J Neurosci. 2011;31:7927–37. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6014-10.2011.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Deroche-Gamonet V. Evidence for Addiction-like Behavior in the Rat. Science. 2004;305:1014–7. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1099020.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Di Chiara G, Imperato A. Drugs abused by humans preferentially increase synaptic dopamine concentrations in the mesolimbic system of freely moving rats. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1988;85:5274–8. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.85.14.5274.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Dickman DK, Davis GW. The schizophrenia susceptibility gene dysbindin controls synaptic homeostasis. Science. 2009;326:1127–30. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1179685.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Diering GH, Huganir RL. The AMPA receptor code of synaptic plasticity. Neuron. 2018;100:314–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2018.10.018.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Engblom D, Bilbao A, Sanchis-Segura C, Dahan L, Perreau-Lenz S, Balland B, et al. Glutamate receptors on dopamine neurons control the persistence of cocaine seeking. Neuron. 2008;59:497–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2008.07.010.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Fernandes D, Carvalho AL. Mechanisms of homeostatic plasticity in the excitatory synapse. J Neurochem. 2016;139:973–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnc.13687.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Friedman AK, Walsh JJ, Juarez B, Ku SM, Chaudhury D, Wang J, et al. Enhancing depression mechanisms in midbrain dopamine neurons achieves homeostatic resilience. Science. 2014;344:313–9. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1249240.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Grimm JW, Hope BT, Wise RA, Shaham Y. Incubation of cocaine craving after withdrawal. Nature. 2001;412:141–2. https://doi.org/10.1038/35084134.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Guzman D, Carreira MB, Friedman AK, Adachi M, Neve RL, Monteggia LM, et al. Inactivation of NMDA receptors in the ventral tegmental area during cocaine self-administration prevents GluA1 up-regulation but with paradoxical increases in cocaine-seeking behavior. J Neurosci. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2828-16.2017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Kauer JA, Malenka RC. Synaptic plasticity and addiction. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007;8:844–58. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2234.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Lane DA, Reed B, Kreek MJ, Pickel VM. Differential glutamate AMPA-receptor plasticity in subpopulations of VTA neurons in the presence or absence of residual cocaine: implications for the development of addiction. Neuropharmacology. 2011;61:1129–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2010.12.031.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Lu W. Repeated administration of amphetamine or cocaine does not alter AMPA receptor subunit expression in the rat midbrain. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2002;26:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0893-133X(01)00272-X.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Moulin TC, Petiz LL, Rayêe D, Winne J, Maia RG, Lima da Cruz RV, et al. Chronic in vivo optogenetic stimulation modulates neuronal excitability, spine morphology, and Hebbian plasticity in the mouse hippocampus. Hippocampus. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1002/hipo.23080.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Moulin TC, Rayêe D, Williams MJ, Schiöth HB. The synaptic scaling literature: A systematic review of methodologies and quality of reporting. Front: Cell. Neurosci; 2020. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2020.00164.

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Pérez-Otaño I, Ehlers MD. Homeostatic plasticity and NMDA receptor trafficking. Trends Neurosci. 2005;28:229–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2005.03.004.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Pignatelli M, Bonci A. Role of dopamine neurons in reward and aversion: a synaptic plasticity perspective. Neuron. 2015;86:1145–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2015.04.015.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Qiu Z, Sylwestrak EL, Lieberman DN, Zhang Y, Liu X-Y, Ghosh A. The rett syndrome protein MeCP2 regulates synaptic scaling. J Neurosci. 2012;32:989–94. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0175-11.2012.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Robinson T. The neural basis of drug craving: an incentive-sensitization theory of addiction. Brain Res Rev. 1993;18:247–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0173(93)90013-P.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Soden ME, Chen L. Fragile X protein fmrp is required for homeostatic plasticity and regulation of synaptic strength by retinoic acid. J Neurosci. 2010;30:16910–21. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3660-10.2010.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Stuber GD, Klanker M, de Ridder B, Bowers MS, Joosten RN, Feenstra MG, et al. Reward-predictive cues enhance excitatory synaptic strength onto midbrain dopamine neurons. Science. 2008;321:1690–2. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1160873.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Turrigiano G. Homeostatic synaptic plasticity: local and global mechanisms for stabilizing neuronal function. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2012;4:a005736. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a005736.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Turrigiano GG, Nelson SB. Homeostatic plasticity in the developing nervous system. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2004;5:97–107. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1327.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Ungless MA, Whistler JL, Malenka RC, Bonci A. Single cocaine exposure in vivo induces long-term potentiation in dopamine neurons. Nature. 2001;411:583–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/35079077.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Wang G, Gilbert J, Man H-Y. AMPA receptor trafficking in homeostatic synaptic plasticity: functional molecules and signaling cascades. Neural Plast. 2012;2012:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/825364.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Yamamoto K, Tanei Z-I, Hashimoto T, Wakabayashi T, Okuno H, Naka Y, et al. Chronic optogenetic activation augments aβ pathology in a mouse model of Alzheimer disease. Cell Rep. 2015;11:859–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2015.04.017.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Zhang XF, Hu XT, White FJ, Wolf ME. Increased responsiveness of ventral tegmental area dopamine neurons to glutamate after repeated administration of cocaine or amphetamine is transient and selectively involves AMPA receptors. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1997;281:699–706.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Zweifel LS, Argilli E, Bonci A, Palmiter RD. Role of NMDA receptors in dopamine neurons for plasticity and addictive behaviors. Neuron. 2008;59:486–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2008.05.028.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Open access funding provided by Uppsala University. TCM is supported by the Kungl Vetenskapssamh Scholarship (Royal Society of Arts and Scientists), provided by Uppsala University, Sweden. HBS is supported by the Swedish Research Council, the Swedish Brain Research Foundation, and by the FAT4BRAIN project funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program [Grant No: 857394]. The funders had no role in the design of the study or in the writing of the manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

TCM contributed with conceptualization, investigation, and writing of the original draft. HBS contributed with conceptualization, supervision and funding acquisition. Both authors reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thiago C. Moulin.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moulin, T.C., Schiöth, H.B. Excitability, synaptic balance, and addiction: The homeostatic dynamics of ionotropic glutamatergic receptors in VTA after cocaine exposure. Behav Brain Funct 16, 6 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12993-020-00168-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Drug dependence
  • Withdrawal
  • Homeostatic plasticity
  • Synaptic scaling
  • Dopamine