Skip to main content
Download PDF

Mediterranean natural extracts improved cognitive behavior in zebrafish and healthy rats and ameliorated lps-induced cognitive impairment in a sex dependent manner

Behavioral and Brain Functions volume 18, Article number: 5 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Several findings suggest neuroinflammation as a contributing factor for the onset of psychiatric disorders such as Alzheimer’s disease, depression, and anxiety. There is increasing evidence pointing out that the Mediterranean diet influences brain and behavior. Mediterranean herbs and spices have been shown to be within those components of the Mediterranean diet involved in cognitive enhancement. Thus, we investigated the influence of Mediterranean natural extracts (MNE), Rosemary extract (RE) and Glycyrrhiza glabra root extract (GGRE), on cognitive behavior.

Results

Adult zebrafish were exposed to RE or GGRE (100 and 250 mg/L) treatments. Both MNE improved memory retention during the T-maze test, although no improvements were observed during the novel object preference. Similarly, chronic administration of RE (150 mg/Kg) and GGRE (150 mg/Kg) improved, respectively, spatial and retention memory, as assessed by the Morris Water Maze (MWM), and the Elevated Plus Maze (EPM) in healthy male rats. However, no improvements were observed during the novel object recognition. Finally, male, and female rats were chronically treated with lipopolysaccharide [(LPS) 300 ug/kg] and orally administered with RE. Interestingly, RE reversed LPS-induced cognitive deficit during the MWM and EPM in female rats.

Conclusions

We found that MNE improved cognition in both zebrafish and rats. Moreover, MNE rescued LPS-induced cognitive impairment in a gender-specific manner. Therefore, our study supports the view that zebrafish represent a valuable preclinical model for drug discovery in neuroscience. These findings contribute to an exciting and growing body of research suggesting that MNE may play an important role in the prevention of cognitive impairment.

Background

Chronic inflammation is now considered to be central to the pathogenesis of psychiatric disorders including Alzheimer’s disease, depression, and anxiety. Recent findings have shown that dysregulation of the inflammatory system may lead to memory dysfunction and cognitive impairment both at preclinical [1] and clinical [2] level.

Accumulating translational evidence has proposed that the quality of diet is a crucial and common determinant for mental health [3, 4]. Healthful eating patterns such as the Mediterranean diet, have been shown to offer protective effects on brain function, such as memory and cognitive processes [5, 6]. A growing number of data indicates that native Mediterranean herbs and spices are within those components of the Mediterranean diet involved in memory and cognitive enhancement [7,8,9,10,11,12].

Liquorice is a root extract from the Glycyrrhiza glabra plant that is widely distributed from southern Europe to the northwestern part of China. A number of studies have shown that chronic Glycyrrhiza glabra roots extract (GGRE) improves cognition in rodents as assessed by the passive avoidance test, the elevated plus maze (EPM) and the Morris Water Maze (MWM) [9, 13]. GGRE has also been shown to ameliorate cognitive impairment induced by diazepam- scopolamine- and ethanol-induced amnesic effects [9, 14].

Rosmarinus officinalis is a perennial herb native to the Mediterranean region. One study showed that chronic administration of rosemary extract (RE) improved cognition in senescence Accelerated Mouse-Prone 8 (SAMP8) mice. Specifically, RE improved cognition as assessed by the T-maze test and the novel object recognition (NOR) [8]. Similarly, RE improved spatial memory during the MWM in repetitive mild Traumatic brain injury (rmTBI) rats [15].

Rodents are an excellent tool for advances towards research in the central nervous system (CNS). However, the high cost of animal housing and the length of the experimental studies [16], critically slow down CNS drug discovery and the identification of novel mechanisms of brain function and dysfunction. Among vertebrates, zebrafish (Danio rerio) has revealed as a complementary model to experimental studies in rodents for research in neuroscience [17]. Zebrafish show multiple advantages, including high physiological and genetic homology to mammals, rapid development, ease of genetic and experimental manipulations, sensitivity to cognitive tests as well as cost- and space-effectiveness [18]. Although zebrafish are newcomers to studies of learning and memory, they are capable of performing well in a range of learning tasks such as, avoidance learning [19], alternation spatial memory task [20], associative learning task [21], object recognition [22], and automated learning paradigm [23].

Bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) is a potent activator of the immune system. Several studies have shown that chronic administration of LPS in rodents alters the signaling between the immune system and the brain affecting emotional mood and cognitive behavior [1, 24]. Therefore, LPS represents an excellent murine model of cognitive impairment commonly used to study the effects of neuroinflammation in the development of neuropsychiatric diseases.

Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the effect of two Mediterranean natural extracts (MNE) in memory and cognition, using a screening system based on zebrafish and testing the most prominent extracts in a murine model of cognitive impairment.

Materials and methods

Husbandry

All procedures and protocols involving the care and use of laboratory animals were reviewed and approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of the Technological Unit of Nutrition and Health of EURECAT (Reus, Spain) and the Generalitat de Catalunya (DAAM 10,026). All sections of this report adhere to the ARRIVE Guidelines for reporting animal research.

Zebrafish

A total of 80 adult (6–8 months old; 3–4 cm long; wild-type) male and female short-finned Danio rerio zebrafish (0.4–1 g) of heterogeneous genetic background were obtained from ZF Biolabs (Madrid, Spain). Fish were kept at 28.5 ± 0.5 °C on a 14:10-h light/dark cycles [25] in a standalone aquatic flow-through system (Dohse Aquaristik GmbH & Co. KG, Grafschaft-Gelsdorf, Germany), provided with constant filtration and aeration, at a density of 2 fish per liter. Water used in the system consisted of reverse osmosis water supplemented with 0.8 g/L sea salts (OSMO FIT, Hobby, Germany). Adult fish were fed daily with commercially available flake fish food (Ocean Nutrition, Newark, U.S.A.) and brine shrimps. Fish were acclimated to the aquatic system for 2 weeks before experiment begins. Behavioral tests took place during the light phase between 08:00 and 18:00 h. All efforts were made to minimize the number of animals used and their discomfort. After experiments, zebrafish were euthanized by hypothermia.

Rats

Male and female (3 weeks old; 80 g) Sprague–Dawley rats (Envigo RMS Spain, Barcelona, Spain) were maintained in the local animal unit. Food and water were available ad libitum and rats were maintained on a 12:12-h light/dark cycles with temperature at 22 ± 1 °C. Male and female rats were housed in separate animal rooms to avoid hormonal effects on the cognitive tests [26]. A total of 80 rats were single housed in plastic cages with sawdust bedding in an enriched environment with shredded paper and a cardboard roll. Rats were left undisturbed except for routine cage cleaning, twice per week, and body weight were measured weekly until treatments. After experiments, adult rats were fastened for 5 h (from 09.00 to 14.00 h) without restriction of water and killed by decapitation.

Treatments

MNE

GGRE (6.2% glycyrrhizic acid) and RE (6% rosmarinic acid) were obtained by Ebro Regaliz (Barcelona, Spain) and Nutrafur (Murcia, Spain), respectively.

Zebrafish

Combined males and females of equal proportion were randomly selected for exposure to GGRE, or RE at a concentration of either 100 or 250 mg/L of water (N = 10/group). Treatments were administered by immersion into a novel water tank for 30 min to minimize stress [27]. After treatment, fish were transferred to another water tank system for 5 min before behavioral tests. To minimize the number of animals used, each fish performed a behavior test battery. Each fish was exposed to the assigned treatment before each behavioral test (twice per fish) (Fig. 1). Control fish were kept under the same conditions used for the treated fish, but without exposure to any treatment.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Study design. Experimental timeline showing A treatment and animal behavior in zebrafish; B treatment and animal behavior in healthy adult male rats; C treatment and animal behavior in LPS-treated adult male and female rats

Full size image

Rats

Two sets of animals were used for two parallel experiments (Fig. 1).

  1. (1)

    Healthy rats. Adult male rats were randomly allocated to the following experimental groups: control, GGRE (150 mg/Kg) or RE (150 mg/Kg), (n = 10/ group).

  2. (2)

    LPS-treated rats. Adult male and female rats were randomly allocated to the following experimental groups: control, LPS, LPS + RE (n = 10/ group).

Once animals were four weeks old underwent oral administration of either GGRE (150 mg/Kg) or RE (150 mg/Kg) for six weeks. Treatments were dissolved in low-fat condensed milk:water (1:10 v/v) and administered by micropipette. Controls were treated with low-fat condensed milk:water (1:10 v/v), only. As for the LPS-treated rats’ study, LPS (300 ug/kg, i.p.) was administered for seven days, during the fourth week of the study, 2 h after RE or vehicle treatments, when animals were seven weeks old. Controls for the LPS group were i.p. injected with 0.9% sterile saline water for the same period. All treatments were administered every day, between 09.00 and 10.00 h. Animals underwent behavioral testing immediately after LPS treatment (Fig. 1). GGRE and RE treatments were based on previous studies where similar doses were applied [41, 42].

Behavioral testing

Zebrafish

Zebrafish underwent a behavior test battery spread over 5 days: T-maze on days one and two; the novel object preference (NOP) on day five. All behavioral tests were performed in the morning between 9.00 and 12.00 h.

T-maze

T-maze was used to measure spatial memory as described previously [28]. The apparatus consisted of a white plexiglass maze with a T shape, filled with 10 cm of tank water. The long arm (50 × 10 cm) was intersected at one of its ends by a short arm (50 × 10 cm). One of the ends of the short arm opens to a larger reservoir (30 cm square) 5 cm deeper than the rest of the maze. The reservoir was enriched with artificial plants and color stones to offer a favorable habitat to the fish. By nature zebrafish would spend more time in the reservoir than in the rest of the maze [28]. The other end of the long arm was connected to a starting zone (30 × 10 cm) by a white removable door (Fig. 2). The protocol consists in three trials [T-Maze T1 (TMT1), TMT2 and TMT3]. During each trial, fish were individually placed in the starting zone for 1 min with the door closed. Then, the start box was raised and lowered after the fish exited. During the TMT1, fish were given a maximum of 4 min to fully explore the maze and encounter the reservoir where they were left for at least 20 s before the end of the trial. Each fish repeated the trial 3 h (TMT2) and 24 h (TMT3) later. After each trial, fish were returned to their home tank. All trials were video-recorded, and the time needed to find the reservoir [transfer latency time (TLT)] was quantified using a digital tracking system (ANY-Maze, version 4.82).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Mediterranean natural extracts improved memory retention in zebrafish. A Time curve representing TLT during TMT1, TMT2 and TMT3 of the T-maze test; B AUC representing TLT during the T-maze test; C Time and interaction scores during the NOP task expressed as exploration ratio (%). Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. (∗ P < 0.05; ∗  ∗ P < 0.01 compared to control; # P < 0.05 compared to 250 mg/L)

Full size image

NOP

NOP was performed as previously described [29]. Briefly, zebrafish were subjected to 5 min of acclimation to the novel tank (29 × 14 × 18 cm tank filled with 14 L of tank water) followed by 10 min of habituation to two identical objects (training phase). After a recovery period of 10 min, one of the two original objects was randomly replaced with a novel object and interactions were monitored for an additional 10 min (testing phase). To avoid thigmotaxis influence, the objects were placed one in front of the other in an equal distance between the center of the tank and the walls. An 8.4 cm × 8.4 cm box was superimposed over each object and the time the fish spent within the boxes was recorded and scored automatically (ANY-Maze, version 4.82).

Rats

Behavioral tests were carried out during the fifth [EPM, NOR and open field (OF)] and sixth (MWM) week of MNE administration, when the animals were eight and nine weeks of age, respectively (Fig. 1). Before each behavioral test, rats were habituated to the test room for 30 min. All experiments were carried out between 9:00 am and 2:00 pm.

EPM

EPM was performed to assess retention memory as described previously [30] with some modification. The maze consisted of two open arms (50 × 10 com) and two enclosed arms (50 × 10 × 40 cm) that all extended from a common central platform (10 × 10 cm). The apparatus was raised 60 cm above the floor on a central pedestal. On the training phase, rats were placed individually at the end of the open arm, facing it away from the central platform. The time that the animal took to move from the open arm to one of the two enclosed arms (4 paws in) was recorded. The same procedure was repeated 60 min (acquisition) and 24 h (retention) after training. To become acquainted with the EPM, if the rat failed to enter the enclosed arm within 120 s, it was guided to one of them and let it to explore the maze for further 60 s before to be returned to its home cage (training phase only). Animal behavior was recorded and TLT (acquisition and retention phases) was analyzed using a tracking system (ANY-Maze, version 4.82). The apparatus was wiped clean with 70% ethanol before testing each animal.

NOR

NOR was used to assess recognition memory as described previously [31] with some modifications. Briefly, rats were placed in a grey plywood rectangular box (70 × 45 × 45 cm) for 5 min for habituation to the novel arena. The day after, rats were habituated to two identical objects [(A), acquisition phase)] placed in the back left and right corners of the experimental box for 3 min. After a delay of 1 h, one of the two familiar objects was replaced with a novel object (B) and rats were replaced in the middle of the box at the mid-point of the wall opposite the sample objects for a total time of 3 min (retention phase). Box and objects were cleaned with alcohol 70% to avoid any cue smell between each trial. Direct contacts with the objects, include any contact with mouth, nose or paw or minimal defined distance (< 2 cm), were recorded and scored automatically (ANY-Maze, version 4.82). Memory discrimination index (MDI), [(B exploration time – A exploration time)/ (B exploration time + A exploration time)], was used to express recognition memory in rats [32].

OF

To assess anxiety-like behavior rats were individually placed in a wooden grey box (70 × 45 × 45 cm) for 5 min. A central area (20 × 40 cm) was drawn in the floor of the apparatus to score time and number of entries in the inner zone. Distance moved, velocity, percentage of time spent in inner zone and frequency of inner zone entries were recorded and analyzed using a tracking system (ANY-Maze, version 4.82). The apparatus was wiped clean with 70% ethanol before testing each animal.

MWM

The MWM is a test of spatial learning and reference memory for rodents that relies on distal cues to navigate from start locations around the perimeter of an open swimming arena to locate a submerged escape platform [33]. The swimming arena consisted of a circular metal pool (150 cm diameter × 58 cm tall) filled with tap water (23-25ºC, 40-cm deep). The maze was divided geographically into four quadrants: Northeast (NE), Northwest (NW), Southeast (SE) and Southwest (SW), and four starting positions, North (N), East (E), West (W), South (S), were located at equal distances along the pool rim. A circular white platform (10 cm diameter) was placed in the center of the NW quadrant and submerged 1.5 cm below the water surface. Water was white colored with a non-toxic white paint to hide the platform. Distal cues were arranged around the maze to provide landmarks that the animals could use to navigate to the platform.

Acquisition training

Rats underwent five days of training that consisted of four trials/day. At the beginning of each trial rats were individually placed in one of the starting positions (N, E, S, or W) facing the wall of the tank and allowed to explore the maze for 60 s. A different starting position was used for each of the 4 trials on a given day arranged in a semi-random pattern. Once rats reached the platform, they were held there for 20 s. If the platform was not found within the given time, rats were gently assisted to the platform by the experimenter and detained there for 20 s.

Removal phase

On day six (removal) the platform was removed, and the rats were allowed to freely explore the maze for 60 s. Rats were individually placed into the quadrant diagonally opposite to the one originally hosting the platform. The amount of time spent in the quadrant where the platform was previously hidden was video recorded and automatically analyzed using a tracking system (ANY-Maze, version 4.82).

Statistical analysis

All the data are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Repeated measure (RM)-ANOVA was performed to analyze differences over time among treatments, whereas ANOVAs analysis followed by LSD’s post-hoc test was performed to analyze single-time points differences between treatment groups. Student’s t-test was used for single statistical comparisons. The level of statistical significance was set at bilateral 5% (p < 0.05). All statistical analysis was performed with the SPSS Statistics 26 software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, United States).

Results

Mediterranean natural extracts improved memory retention in zebrafish

T-maze

The T-maze was used to assess memory retention in zebrafish. For RE effects on zebrafish, RM-ANOVA revealed an overall learning improvement over time (f (2,76) = 6.928, p = 0.002) and a significant time by treatment interaction (f (4,76) = 4.513, p = 0.003), (Fig. 2A). Interestingly, significant time by treatment interaction was mainly due to the treatment effect lasting for 24 h. In contrast, in the control groups cognitive abilities returned to basal at 24 h time point. Accordingly, LSD’s multiple comparisons post hoc analysis showed that RE supplementation reduced TLT of 50% (100 mg/L) and of 30% (250 mg/L) at 24 h time point, compared to controls (Fig. 2A). For GGRE effects on zebrafish, RM-ANOVA revealed an overall learning improvement over time (f (4,74) = 15.087, p = 0.000) and a significant time by treatment interaction (f (4,74) = 4.385, p = 0.00), (Fig. 2A). Similar to the RE effects, significant time by treatment interaction was mainly due to the long lasting effects of GGRE up to 24 h. Post hoc analysis showed that TLT was higher in zebrafish treated with GGRE (250 mg/L) at baseline compared to both controls and GGRE 100 mg/L-treated zebrafish. GGRE (100 mg/L) reduced TLT of 25% at 3 h time point compared to controls. Moreover, GGRE, at both concentrations, reduced TLT of 57% at 24 h time point compared to controls (Fig. 2A). Similarly, AUC analysis confirmed the improved learning in both RE- and GGRE-treated zebrafish (1-way ANOVA: f (4,75) = 3.092, p = 0.021; Fig. 2B). Moreover, post hoc analysis revealed that both RE and GGRE improved memory retention at a concentration of 100 mg/L, only (Fig. 2A).

NOP

The NOP task was used to assess recognition memory in zebrafish. All the experimental groups successfully performed the training phase showing no preference for neither one of the familiar objects (data not shown). When zebrafish were exposed to the novel and the familiar objects (test phase) all the groups were able to discriminate the familiar object from the novel one (more than 50%), (Fig. 2C). However, MNE did not induce cognitive improvement during the NOP task.

Mediterranean natural extracts improved learning and cognition in adult rats

To confirm the findings obtained from the zebrafish study, cognitive behavior was assessed in healthy male rats chronically treated with either RE or GGRE.

MWM

To assess whether MNE improved spatial learning and memory, rats were trained over five consecutive days to find a hidden platform in the MWM. RM-ANOVA revealed a significant effect of time (f (4,92) = 53.013, p = 0.000; Fig. 3A), only. LSD’s multiple comparisons post hoc analysis showed that RE supplementation improved learning at days 2 (p = 0.036), 3 (p = 0.018) and 5 (p = 0.030) of the training sessions compared to controls (Fig. 3A). Similarly, AUC analysis confirmed the improved learning in RE-treated rats (1-way ANOVA: f (2,26) = 3.668, p = 0.040; LSD’s post hoc test: p = 0.012; Fig. 3A) compared to controls. However, no improvements were observed in rats treated with GGRE (Fig. 3A). To assess spatial long-term memory, a probe trial was performed on day 6. However, no improvement induced by MNE was found (f (2,27) = 1.522, p = 0.236; Fig. 3A).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Mediterranean natural extracts improved learning and cognition in adult rats. A MWM represented by latency time to reach the platform over 5 training days, AUC and removal phase 24 h after the last training day; B EPM represented by the time to reach the reservoir at 0 h (training), 1 h (acquisition) and 24 h (retention) as well as AUC; C NOR represented by the time spent with the objects expressed as exploration ratio (%); D distance travelled during the OF test. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. (∗ P < 0.05 compared to control; t P < 0.05 compared to control, unpaired student’s t-test)

Full size image

EPM

We further tested the effect of MNE on retention memory by assessing the EPM test. RM-ANOVA revealed that all experimental groups improved TLT towards one of the enclosed arms of the maze over time (f (2,46) = 51.430, p = 0.000; Fig. 3B). Moreover, single statistical comparison analysis revealed that GGRE-treated rats improved TLT at 24 h’ time point, when compared to controls (student’s t-test: p = 0.045; Fig. 3B). Similarly, AUC analysis confirmed memory improvements in GGRE-treated rats (student’s t-test: p = 0.027; Fig. 3B). No improvements induced by RE were observed.

NOR

Next, we tested whether MNE supplementation can modulate recognition memory as assessed by the NOR task. All experimental groups successfully discriminate the novel object from the familiar one as expressed by an exploration ratio score higher than 50% (Fig. 3C). However, neither RE nor GGRE improved recognition memory compared to controls.

OF

None of the treatments altered locomotor activity as assessed by the OF test (Fig. 3D). No other changes such as time and number of crossings in the inner zone were found (data not shown).

RE reversed LPS-induced cognitive impairment in rats in a sex dependent manner

The study on healthy rats revealed a stronger effect of RE on learning skills and spatial memory compared to GGRE. In accordance, we selected RE to further investigate whether MNE exert any protective effect in a rat model of cognitive impairment induced by neuroinflammation. To this aim, cognitive deficit was induced by chronic injection of LPS (300 mg/kg) for 7 consecutively days to both male and female rats before animal behavior commenced.

MWM

The effects of chronic administration of RE against LPS-induced cognitive impairment during the MWM are shown in Fig. 4A. For RE effects on female rats, RM-ANOVA revealed a significant effect of time (f (4,96) = 56.788, p = 0.000), a significant time by RE interaction (f (4,96) = 4.078, p = 0.004) and a significant time by LPS interaction (f (4,96) = 2.772, p = 0.031), (Fig. 4A). LSD’s multiple comparisons post hoc analysis showed escape latency time to be higher in the LPS group at days 2 (p = 0.000) and 3 (p = 0.049) of the training phase (Fig. 4A). Interestingly, LPS + RE female rats were able to find the hidden platform faster than the LPS-treated group both at days 2 (p = 0.049) and 5 (p = 0.049), (Fig. 4A). To assess spatial long-term memory, a probe trial was performed on day 6. One-way ANOVA revealed a significant effect of group on time spent in the target quadrant (f (2,27) = 11.348, p = 0.000; Fig. 4A). LSD’s multiple comparisons post hoc analysis showed spatial long-term memory deficit in LPS treated rats when compared to controls (p = 0.026; Fig. 4A). Interestingly, RE treatment reversed LPS-induced cognitive impairment (p = 0.000; Fig. 4A). Moreover, RE + LPS treated rats spent more time in the target quadrant compared to controls (p = 0.023; Fig. 4A). Similarly, AUC analysis confirmed that RE reversed LPS-induced learning impairment in female rats (f (2,26) = 7.084, p = 0.004; Fig. 4A). For RE effects on male rats, RM-ANOVA revealed a significant effect of time (f (4,56) = 25.109, p = 0.000; Fig. 4A), only. Moreover, LSD’s multiple comparisons post hoc analysis revealed learning deficit at day 5 of the training sessions induced by LPS administration to male rats (p = 0.0322; Fig. 4A). However, no further changes were observed in male rats, as referred to AUC analysis and the total time in the target quadrant (Fig. 4A). Therefore, data indicated that RE protective effects in response to LPS stimulation were more pronounced in female than male rats.

Fig. 4
figure 4

RE reversed LPS-induced cognitive impairment in rats in a sex dependent manner. A MWM represented by latency time to reach the platform over 5 training days, AUC and removal phase 24 h after the last training day; B EPM score represented by the time to reach the reservoir at 0 h (training), 1 h (acquisition) and 24 h (retention) as well as AUC. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. (∗ P < 0.05; ∗  ∗ P < 0.01; ∗  ∗  ∗ P < 0.001 compared to control, # P < 0.05 ## P < 0.01 compared to LPS)

Full size image

EPM

The effects of chronic administration of RE against LPS-induced cognitive impairment during the EPM are shown in Fig. 4A. For RE effects on female rats, RM-ANOVA revealed a significant effect of time (f (2,54) = 69.210, p = 0.000), a significant time by LPS interaction (f (2,54) = 8.170, p = 0.001), (Fig. 4A). LSD’s multiple comparisons post hoc analysis showed that LPS induced cognitive retention impairment in female rats at both 1 (p = 0.000) and 24 h (p = 0.002), (Fig. 4B). Interestingly, TLT score was lower in LPS + RE female rats compared to the LPS-treated (p = 0.030; Fig. 4B). Moreover, RE reversed LPS-induced memory deficit at 24 h’ time point (p = 0.002; Fig. 4B). AUC analysis confirmed the protective effect exerted by RE against LPS-induced cognitive deficit as shown during the EPM test (f (2,26) = 13.679, p = 0.000; Fig. 4B). No RE effects were observed in male rats (Fig. 4B).

Discussion

The present studies demonstrate that selective MNE can induce cognitive enhancement in adult zebrafish. Moreover, we showed that chronic administration of both GGRE and RE had similar cognitive improvements in healthy rats. Additionally, we demonstrated that LPS-induced cognitive impairment was reversed by chronic RE administration in female rats only. Our findings provide additional support for MNE as potential memory enhancement as well as potential complementary compounds to current therapeutic interventions in the treatment of cognitive impairment and suggests that MNE may be more efficacious in females with a neuroinflammatory profile.

Rodents have been traditionally used to advance our knowledge on human behavior, such as learning and cognition. However, expanding the range of experimental domains with the use of additional models, is now considered as an important strategy for translational neuroscience research [34]. Recent data suggest zebrafish as an emerging successful model to study cognitive phenotypes and CNS related drug discovery [35,36,37]. Accordingly, our behavioral results show that both GGRE and RE improved retention memory as indicated by the T-maze test. Similarly, RE has been shown to improve cognitive function in a zebrafish model of amnesia induced by scopolamine [38]. We also found that improvement in retention memory was best at the lowest concentration used (100 mg/L). This suggests that at high doses (250 mg/L) both GGRE and RE may have off-target activity. Ceiling effects have been previously observed with other natural extracts in rats [39, 40]. Interestingly, the results obtained in zebrafish correlated with those observed in healthy male rats. Specifically, RE demonstrated improvements in spatial learning as indicated by the MWM. Moreover, a better recall memory was observed in GGRE treated rats at 24 h, but not 1 h, from the training phase of the EPM task. In a similar study, GGRE improved memory functions in a mice model of LPS-induced neuroinflammation [41]. Moreover, RE has been shown to rescue learning and spatial memory deficits in a rat model of epilepsy induced by treatment with kainic acid [42]. Interestingly, a randomized clinical trial observed that RE treatment positively affected memory performance, anxiety, depression, and sleep quality in 34 Iranian university students [43]. On the other hand, no improvements were found in recognition memory either in zebrafish or in rats as assessed by the NOP and the NOR tests, respectively. There is a wide agreement that both spatial learning and long-term memory are largely dependent on the integrity of the hippocampus [44, 45], whereas its role in recognition memory is controversial. A number of studies suggest no effect of hippocampal lesion in recognition memory [46, 47], while other studies reported significant impairments [48, 49]. Moreover, it is suggested that tasks of recognition memory are mainly supported by cortical structures adjacent to the hippocampus and that are less dependent to hippocampal malfunctioning [50, 51]. For instance, the hippocampus receives projections from the adjacent perirhinal and entorhinal cortices which have been shown to severely disrupt recognition memory in rodents [50]. Thus, our data may suggest that the observed improvements in spatial learning and long-term memory induced by GGRE and RE may be due to their action on neuronal circuitries specifically involved in the regulation of hippocampal-dependent tasks both in zebrafish and rats. However, it should be mentioned that improvements in recognition memory induced by RE and GGRE have been previously reported in mice [41, 52]. The discrepancy with our findings may be found in the applied animal model of cognitive impairment and the type of rodents used. Further analysis is warranted to shed more light on this issue.

Growing evidence suggests that females are more susceptible to the development of mood and cognitive deficits compared to males, leading to a higher risk for psychopathologies [53]. Neuroinflammation has been indicated as one of the main factors that contribute to sex differences in psychiatric diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease, depression and anxiety [54, 55]. LPS injections represent a widely used animal model of neuroinflammation that has been shown to disrupt memory and cognition in rodents [1, 56]. We observed that, at the chosen dose of 300 ug/kg, LPS chronic administration impaired females’ learning, and cognition of a greater extent compared to male rats. Interestingly, RE chronic treatment demonstrated protective cognitive effects in response to LPS chronic injection. However, such effect was blunted by LPS administration in male rats. Such discrepancy may be found on the different immunological response between genders that in turn may be associated with the gender-specific outcomes from RE treatment. Further research is warranted.

In conclusion, we demonstrated that zebrafish can be considered as a valuable preclinical model for drug discovery in neuroscience. The results obtained in zebrafish are, to a great extent, comparable to those observed in healthy rats. Moreover, we provided further evidence that neuroinflammation is involved in the regulation of learning and cognition using a rat model of LPS-induced memory impairment. Notably, the protective effects of the selected MNE against LPS-induced memory impairment were gender-specific. Finally, this study shed light on the beneficial role of MNE administration in enhancing cognitive abilities both in healthy rodents and rats exhibiting cognitive impairment.

Data availability

We will make our data available should it be required.

Abbreviations

CNS:

Central nervous system

E:

East

EPM:

Elevated plus maze

GGRE:

Glycyrrhiza glabra roots extract

LPS:

Lipopolysaccharide

MDI:

Memory discrimination index

MNE:

Mediterranean natural extracts

MWM:

Morris Water Maze

N:

North

NE:

Northeast

NOP:

Novel object preference

NOR:

Novel object recognition

NW:

Northwest

OF:

Open field

RE:

Rosemary extract

RM:

Repeated measure

rmTBI:

Repetitive mild traumatic brain injury

S:

South

SAMP8:

Senescence Accelerated Mouse-Prone 8

SE:

Southeast

SEM:

Standard error of the mean

SW:

Southwest

TLT:

Transfer latency time

TMT:

T-Maze Trial

W:

West

References

  1. Zhao J, Bi W, Xiao S, Lan X, Cheng X, Zhang J, et al. Neuroinflammation induced by lipopolysaccharide causes cognitive impairment in mice. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):5790.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Simen AA, Bordner KA, Martin MP, Moy LA, Barry LC. Cognitive dysfunction with aging and the role of inflammation. Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2011;2(3):175–95.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Gomez-Pinilla F. Brain foods: the effects of nutrients on brain function. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008;9(7):568–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Jacka FN, Sacks G, Berk M, Allender S. Food policies for physical and mental health. BMC Psychiatry. 2014;14:132.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Martinez-Lapiscina EH, Clavero P, Toledo E, Estruch R, Salas-Salvado J, San Julian B, et al. Mediterranean diet improves cognition: the PREDIMED-NAVARRA randomised trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2013;84(12):1318–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Feart C, Samieri C, Alles B, Barberger-Gateau P. Potential benefits of adherence to the Mediterranean diet on cognitive health. Proc Nutr Soc. 2013;72(1):140–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Soodi M, Naghdi N, Hajimehdipoor H, Choopani S, Sahraei E. Memory-improving activity of Melissa officinalis extract in naive and scopolamine-treated rats. Res Pharm Sci. 2014;9(2):107–14.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Farr SA, Niehoff ML, Ceddia MA, Herrlinger KA, Lewis BJ, Feng S, et al. Effect of botanical extracts containing carnosic acid or rosmarinic acid on learning and memory in SAMP8 mice. Physiol Behav. 2016;165:328–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dhingra D, Parle M, Kulkarni SK. Memory enhancing activity of Glycyrrhiza glabra in mice. J Ethnopharmacol. 2004;91(2–3):361–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Subash S, Braidy N, Essa MM, Zayana AB, Ragini V, Al-Adawi S, et al. Long-term (15 mo) dietary supplementation with pomegranates from Oman attenuates cognitive and behavioral deficits in a transgenic mice model of Alzheimer’s disease. Nutrition. 2015;31(1):223–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nam SM, Choi JH, Yoo DY, Kim W, Jung HY, Kim JW, et al. Valeriana officinalis extract and its main component, valerenic acid, ameliorate D-galactose-induced reductions in memory, cell proliferation, and neuroblast differentiation by reducing corticosterone levels and lipid peroxidation. Exp Gerontol. 2013;48(11):1369–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hassani S, Alipour A, Darvishi Khezri H, Firouzian A, Emami Zeydi A, Gholipour Baradari A, et al. Can Valeriana officinalis root extract prevent early postoperative cognitive dysfunction after CABG surgery? A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Psychopharmacology. 2015;232(5):843–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chakravarthi KK, Avadhani R. Beneficial effect of aqueous root extract of Glycyrrhiza glabra on learning and memory using different behavioral models: an experimental study. J Nat Sci Biol Med. 2013;4(2):420–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Parle M, Dhingra D, Kulkarni SK. Memory-strengthening activity of Glycyrrhiza glabra in exteroceptive and interoceptive behavioral models. J Med Food. 2004;7(4):462–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Song H, Xu L, Zhang R, Cao Z, Zhang H, Yang L, et al. Rosemary extract improves cognitive deficits in a rats model of repetitive mild traumatic brain injury associated with reduction of astrocytosis and neuronal degeneration in hippocampus. Neurosci Lett. 2016;622:95–101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Troublesome variability in mouse studies. Nat Neurosci. 2009;12(9):1075. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn0909-1075

  17. Levin ED, Cerutti DT. Behavioral neuroscience of zebrafish. In: Buccafusco JJ, editor. Methods of behavior analysis in neuroscience. Frontiers in neuroscience. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Stewart AM, Braubach O, Spitsbergen J, Gerlai R, Kalueff AV. Zebrafish models for translational neuroscience research: from tank to bedside. Trends Neurosci. 2014;37(5):264–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Blank M, Guerim LD, Cordeiro RF, Vianna MR. A one-trial inhibitory avoidance task to zebrafish: rapid acquisition of an NMDA-dependent long-term memory. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2009;92(4):529–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Williams FE, White D, Messer WS. A simple spatial alternation task for assessing memory function in zebrafish. Behav Processes. 2002;58(3):125–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sison M, Gerlai R. Associative learning performance is impaired in zebrafish (Danio rerio) by the NMDA-R antagonist MK-801. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2011;96(2):230–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Faillace MP, Pisera-Fuster A, Medrano MP, Bejarano AC, Bernabeu RO. Short- and long-term effects of nicotine and the histone deacetylase inhibitor phenylbutyrate on novel object recognition in zebrafish. Psychopharmacology. 2017;234(6):943–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hicks C, Sorocco D, Levin M. Automated analysis of behavior: a computer-controlled system for drug screening and the investigation of learning. J Neurobiol. 2006;66(9):977–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Biesmans S, Meert TF, Bouwknecht JA, Acton PD, Davoodi N, DeHaes P, et al. Systemic immune activation leads to neuroinflammation and sickness behavior in mice. Mediators Inflamm. 2013;2013:271359.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Harper C, Lawrence C. The laboratory zebrafish. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gibbs RB. Testosterone and estradiol produce different effects on cognitive performance in male rats. Horm Behav. 2005;48(3):268–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Torres-Hernandez BA, Del Valle-Mojica LM, Ortiz JG. Valerenic acid and Valeriana officinalis extracts delay onset of Pentylenetetrazole (PTZ)-Induced seizures in adult Danio rerio (Zebrafish). BMC Complement Altern Med. 2015;15:228.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Darland T, Dowling JE. Behavioral screening for cocaine sensitivity in mutagenized zebrafish. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98(20):11691–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. May Z, Morrill A, Holcombe A, Johnston T, Gallup J, Fouad K, et al. Object recognition memory in zebrafish. Behav Brain Res. 2016;296:199–210.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Batool Z, Sadir S, Liaquat L, Tabassum S, Madiha S, Rafiq S, et al. Repeated administration of almonds increases brain acetylcholine levels and enhances memory function in healthy rats while attenuates memory deficits in animal model of amnesia. Brain Res Bull. 2016;120:63–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Pusceddu MM, Kelly P, Ariffin N, Cryan JF, Clarke G, Dinan TG. n-3 PUFAs have beneficial effects on anxiety and cognition in female rats: effects of early life stress. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2015;58:79–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Blalock EM, Chen KC, Sharrow K, Herman JP, Porter NM, Foster TC, et al. Gene microarrays in hippocampal aging: statistical profiling identifies novel processes correlated with cognitive impairment. J Neurosci. 2003;23(9):3807–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. O’Mahony SM, McVey Neufeld KA, Waworuntu RV, Pusceddu MM, Manurung S, Murphy K, et al. The enduring effects of early-life stress on the microbiota-gut-brain axis are buffered by dietary supplementation with milk fat globule membrane and a prebiotic blend. Eur J Neurosci. 2020;51(4):1042–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kalueff AV, Wheaton M, Murphy DL. What’s wrong with my mouse model? Advances and strategies in animal modeling of anxiety and depression. Behav Brain Res. 2007;179(1):1–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Levin ED. Zebrafish assessment of cognitive improvement and anxiolysis: filling the gap between in vitro and rodent models for drug development. Rev Neurosci. 2011;22(1):75–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Saleem S, Kannan RR. Zebrafish: an emerging real-time model system to study Alzheimer’s disease and neurospecific drug discovery. Cell Death Discov. 2018;4:45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Best JD, Alderton WK. Zebrafish: an in vivo model for the study of neurological diseases. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2008;4(3):567–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Capatina L, Boiangiu RS, Dumitru G, Napoli EM, Ruberto G, Hritcu L, et al. Rosmarinus officinalis essential oil improves scopolamine-induced neurobehavioral changes via restoration of cholinergic function and brain antioxidant status in zebrafish (Danio rerio). Antioxidants (Basel). 2020;9(1):62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Tabach R, Rodrigues E, Carlini EA. Preclinical toxicological assessment of a phytotherapeutic product–CPV (based on dry extracts of Crataegus oxyacantha L., Passiflora incarnata L., and Valeriana officinalis L.). Phytother Res. 2009;23(1):33–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Wu H, Cai L, de Haan JB, Giacconi R. Targeting oxidative stress in diabetic complications: new insights. J Diabetes Res. 2018;2018:1909675.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Cho MJ, Kim JH, Park CH, Lee AY, Shin YS, Lee JH, et al. Comparison of the effect of three licorice varieties on cognitive improvement via an amelioration of neuroinflammation in lipopolysaccharide-induced mice. Nutr Res Pract. 2018;12(3):191–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Naderali E, Nikbakht F, Ofogh SN, Rasoolijazi H. The role of rosemary extract in degeneration of hippocampal neurons induced by kainic acid in the rat: a behavioral and histochemical approach. J Integr Neurosci. 2018;17(1):19–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Nematolahi P, Mehrabani M, Karami-Mohajeri S, Dabaghzadeh F. Effects of Rosmarinus officinalis L. on memory performance, anxiety, depression, and sleep quality in university students: A randomized clinical trial. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2018;30:24–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Broadbent NJ, Squire LR, Clark RE. Spatial memory, recognition memory, and the hippocampus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101(40):14515–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Vianna MR, Alonso M, Viola H, Quevedo J, de Paris F, Furman M, et al. Role of hippocampal signaling pathways in long-term memory formation of a nonassociative learning task in the rat. Learn Mem. 2000;7(5):333–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Mumby DG, Gaskin S, Glenn MJ, Schramek TE, Lehmann H. Hippocampal damage and exploratory preferences in rats: memory for objects, places, and contexts. Learn Mem. 2002;9(2):49–57.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Good MA, Barnes P, Staal V, McGregor A, Honey RC. Context- but not familiarity-dependent forms of object recognition are impaired following excitotoxic hippocampal lesions in rats. Behav Neurosci. 2007;121(1):218–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Clark RE, West AN, Zola SM, Squire LR. Rats with lesions of the hippocampus are impaired on the delayed nonmatching-to-sample task. Hippocampus. 2001;11(2):176–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Clark RE, Zola SM, Squire LR. Impaired recognition memory in rats after damage to the hippocampus. J Neurosci. 2000;20(23):8853–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Norman G, Eacott MJ. Impaired object recognition with increasing levels of feature ambiguity in rats with perirhinal cortex lesions. Behav Brain Res. 2004;148(1–2):79–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Warburton EC, Brown MW. Neural circuitry for rat recognition memory. Behav Brain Res. 2015;285:131–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Karim N, Khan I, Abdelhalim A, Abdel-Halim H, Hanrahan JR. Molecular docking and antiamnesic effects of nepitrin isolated from Rosmarinus officinalis on scopolamine-induced memory impairment in mice. Biomed Pharmacother. 2017;96:700–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Bekhbat M, Neigh GN. Sex differences in the neuro-immune consequences of stress: focus on depression and anxiety. Brain Behav Immun. 2018;67:1–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Fonken LK, Frank MG, Gaudet AD, D’Angelo HM, Daut RA, Hampson EC, et al. Neuroinflammatory priming to stress is differentially regulated in male and female rats. Brain Behav Immun. 2018;70:257–67.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Derry HM, Padin AC, Kuo JL, Hughes S, Kiecolt-Glaser JK. Sex differences in depression: does inflammation play a role? Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2015;17(10):78.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Baluchnejadmojarad T, Zeinali H, Roghani M. Scutellarin alleviates lipopolysaccharide-induced cognitive deficits in the rat: Insights into underlying mechanisms. Int Immunopharmacol. 2018;54:311–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Ms Anna Antolín, Ms Gertruda Chomiciute, Ms Cristina Egea Vilches, Ms Iris Triguero for their technical assistance in performing the experimental studies.

Funding

MMP has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No 712949 (TECNIOspring PLUS) and from the Agency for Business Competitiveness of the Government of Catalonia. LB has received funding from the Spanish government under the Juan de la Cierva-Formación fellowship. This work was financially supported by ACCIO through the project KETRENOVIN of the RIS3CAT initiative (COMRDI 15-1-0028); and by the Centre for the Development of Industrial Technology (CDTI) of the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation under grant agreement: TECNOMIFOOD project. CER-20191010.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Eurecat, Centre Tecnològic de Catalunya, Unitat de Nutrició I Salut, Reus, Spain

    Matteo M. Pusceddu, Julia Hernandez-Baixauli, Francesc Puiggrós, Lluis Arola, Antoni Caimari, Josep M. Del Bas & Laura Baselga

  2. Departament de Bioquímica I Biotecnologia, Grup de Recerca en Nutrigenòmica, Universitat Rovira I Virgili, Tarragona, Spain

    Lluis Arola

Authors
  1. Matteo M. Pusceddu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Julia Hernandez-Baixauli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Francesc Puiggrós
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lluis Arola
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Antoni Caimari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Josep M. Del Bas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Laura Baselga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

MMP: Formal analysis, Writing—Original draft, Visualization, Conceptualization JH-B: Investigation FP: Project administration LA: Project Administration AC: Conceptualization, Methodology, Editing JMDB: Conceptualization, Editing LB: Conceptualization, Methodology. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Matteo M. Pusceddu, Antoni Caimari or Josep M. Del Bas.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures and protocols involving the care and use of laboratory animals were reviewed and approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of the Technological Unit of Nutrition and Health of EURECAT (Reus, Spain) and the Generalitat de Catalunya (DAAM 10026). All sections of this report adhere to the ARRIVE Guidelines for reporting animal research. Full efforts were made to diminish the use of animals and to improve their wellbeing.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pusceddu, M.M., Hernandez-Baixauli, J., Puiggrós, F. et al. Mediterranean natural extracts improved cognitive behavior in zebrafish and healthy rats and ameliorated lps-induced cognitive impairment in a sex dependent manner. Behav Brain Funct 18, 5 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12993-022-00190-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12993-022-00190-8

Keywords

Behavioral and Brain Functions

ISSN: 1744-9081

Contact us