Skip to content

Advertisement

Behavioral and Brain Functions

Open Access

Association between cerebral dopamine neurotrophic factor (CDNF) 2 polymorphisms and schizophrenia susceptibility and symptoms in the Han Chinese population

Behavioral and Brain Functions201814:1

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12993-017-0133-4

Received: 9 October 2017

Accepted: 22 December 2017

Published: 3 January 2018

Abstract

Background

Schizophrenia (SZ) is a complex polygenic psychiatric disorder caused in part by abnormal dopamine levels. Cerebral dopamine neurotrophic factor (CDNF) 2 is known to protect and repair the dopaminergic system. Dopamine dysfunction is one of the pathogenesis of SZ. However, the relationship between CDNF2 and SZ has not been previously investigated. We speculated that CDNF2 may be a susceptibility factor for SZ.

Methods

To address this issue, we carried out a study to investigate the association between CDNF2 and SZ in the total sample 1371 (670 SZ patients and 701 healthy controls) Han Chinese population. Stage 1 included 528 SZ patients and 528 healthy controls; and stage 2 included 142 SZ patients and 173 healthy controls. The allele and genotype frequencies of five single nucleotide polymorphisms (rs2577074, rs2577075, rs2249810, rs6506891, and rs2118343) of CDNF2 were compared between patients and controls.

Results

We found a significant association in allele and genotype frequencies between the two groups at rs2249810 (χ2 = 4.38 and 6.45, respectively; P = 0.03 and 0.04, respectively). An association was also observed in males at rs2249810 (χ2 = 8.76; P = 0.03). Haplotype TGATC differed between SZ and controls in stage 2 samples (χ2 = 6.38; P = 0.01), and rs2118343 genotypes were associated with negative factor scores (F = 4.396; P = 0.01).

Conclusions

These results suggest that rs2249810 and haplotype TGATC of CDNF2 are an SZ susceptibility locus and factor, respectively, and that rs2118343 genotypes are associated with negative symptoms of SZ in the Han Chinese population.

Keywords

CDNF2 PolymorphismPANSSSchizophrenia

Background

Schizophrenia (SZ) is a complex psychiatric disorder with an estimated heritability of 60–80% that affects 1.0% of the global population [13]. Previous studies have reported that the absolute risk of suicide in SZ to be 6.55% in male and 4.91% in female [4], and suicide was 13-fold higher for SZ than the general population [5]. The core symptoms of SZ vary in terms of severity among patients [6]. Research on the genetic basis of SZ has focused on identifying polymorphisms in candidate genes and linkage regions [710]. To date, 108 SZ-associated gene loci have been identified in a genome-wide association analysis (GWAS) of the largest sample size to date (36,989 cases vs. 113,075 controls) [11]. However, others have reported that multiple genes contribute weakly or moderately to SZ pathogenesis [12]. Identifying SZ susceptibility genes among numerous candidates is an ongoing challenge.

Abnormal dopamine levels underlie SZ. Neurotrophic factors, such as brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), nerve growth factor, glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor, and cerebral dopamine neurotrophic factor (CDNF), can repair and protect the dopaminergic system. Previous studies have shown that BDNF is involved in the pathophysiology of SZ, with BDNF levels reduced in the serum and cerebrospinal fluid of patients [13]. CDNF has been shown to protect and repair the dopaminergic system in rat models of Parkinson’s disease (PD) [14], which is characterized by degeneration of dopaminergic neurons; it may thus have therapeutic benefits [15]. However, the relationship between CDNF and SZ has not been previously investigated. We speculated that CDNF is a susceptibility factor for SZ. We tested this hypothesis by examining CDNF single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in two study stages with independent sample sets.

Methods

Stage 1 samples were those from our previous publications [16, 17], and included 528 paranoid SZ patients (mean age: 27.32 ± 8.03 years old) and 528 healthy controls (mean age: 27.73 ± 8.01 years old) who were recruited from March 2005 to December 2008. Stage 2 samples included 142 SZ patients (paranoid, n = 122 and undifferentiated, n = 20; mean age: 29.28 ± 7.17 years old) and 173 healthy controls (mean age: 32.49 ± 7.43 years old) who were recruited from May 2011 to December 2014.

SZ was diagnosed as previously described [16, 17] according to the criteria listed in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Fourth Edition (DSM-IV). Exclusion criteria were as follows: patients had been diagnosed with other psychiatric disorders; or had organic brain disease, substance dependence, severe medical complications, or neurological diseases. Family mental health history (FH) was defined as at least one first- or second-degree relative of the proband who met DSM-IV criteria for SZ or schizoaffective disorder. The Positive and Negative Symptom Scale (PANSS) was used to evaluate psychotic syndromes. Five factors were derived from the PANSS, including positive symptoms, negative symptoms, cognition, expression/anxiety, and excitement/hostility [18].

A total of 372 SZ patients (stage 1, n = 229 and stage 2, n = 143) who were not taking antipsychotic medications were evaluated for psychotic syndromes using the PANSS [19]. Inclusion and exclusion criteria for healthy controls were as described our previous papers [16, 17]. These subjects were screened by psychiatrists in simple non-structured interviews. All participants were unrelated Han Chinese who were born and living in North Henan province.

Five SNPs were selected as described in our previous work [16, 17] and covered the 26974145–26995906 genomic intron region on chromosome 10. In stage 1, genotyping was carried out as detailed in our earlier studies [16, 17] using Illumina GoldenGate assays on a BeadStation 500G Genotyping System (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). In stage 2, samples were genotyped using a standard Illumina genotyping protocol.

Statistical analyses in this study were performed as described in our previous papers [16, 17]. Power analyses were performed using the G*Power software to calculated (http://www.gpower.hhu.de/) for this study [20, 21]. Genotype and allele frequencies were analyzed using Haploview v.4.1. Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium was assessed with the χ2 test with one degree of freedom. Associations between the five factors from the PANSS and different genotype carriers were evaluated by analysis of variance. Bonferroni correction for multiple pair-wise comparisons was conducted for the X × phenotype interaction to reduce the probability of false positives. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The corrected α′ (P = 0.01) is α (P = 0.05) divided by the number of possible comparisons.

Results

To identify allelic variants of the CDNF2 gene that are associated with SZ, we analyzed two sets of samples. The sampling success rate for subjects and SNPs was 99.84%. Power analyses revealed that the total sample size (n = 1371) had a power of 0.96 to detect a small effect (r = 0.1–0.23), and a power of 1.00 to detect both medium (r = 0.24–0.36) and large (r > 0.37) effects on genotype distributions. For allele frequency, the sample size (n = 2742) had the power (0.91–1.00) to detect small, medium, and large effects.

None of the genotype distributions of the other four SNPs significantly deviated from HWE except for SNP rs6506891. There were no significant differences in genotype and allele frequencies between SZ and controls at five SNPs in stage 1 samples (P > 0.05, Table 1), even after subdividing by gender and FH (P > 0.05). However, there were significant differences in genotype and allele frequencies between SZ and controls at rs2249810, rs6506891, and rs2118343 in stage 2 samples. We also noted differences at rs2249810 when stage 1 and 2 samples were combined. This association was present at rs2249810 in males (χ2 = 8.76; P = 0.03). To further analyze haplotype structures in this sample, we evaluated pairwise linkage disequilibrium (LD) of five SNPs in SZ patients and controls using standardized D′ and r2 values. Haplotypes were identified at five SNPs of CDNF2 in stage 1 and 2 samples. The positions of these SNPs in stage 2, LD structure, and D′ values for all variants are shown in Fig. 1. Five SNPs formed one LD block, yielding four haplotypes; one of these (TGATC) differed significantly between SZ and controls only in stage 2 samples (χ2 = 6.38; P = 0.01) (Table 2).
Table 1

Genotype and allele frequencies of SNPs in the CDNF2 gene in patients with SZ and controls

dbSNP ID

Stage

Allele (D/d)a

Patients

Controls

P valuec

Combine P value

nb

HWE (p)

Genotype

MAF

nb

HWE (P)

Genotype

MAF

DD

Dd

dd

DD

Dd

dd

 

Genotype

Allele

Genotype

Allele

rs2577074

1

G/A

528

0.35

144

253

131

0.49

528

0.12

140

281

107

0.469

0.14

0.09

0.43

0.89

2

142

0.58

44

73

25

0.18

173

0.32

41

93

39

0.225

0.28

0.13

rs2577075

1

A/G

527

0.37

143

253

131

0.49

527

0.13

140

280

107

0.469

0.15

0.29

0.15

0.14

2

142

0.58

44

73

25

0.18

170

0.22

40

93

37

0.218

0.30

0.15

rs2249810

1

G/A

528

0.18

186

242

100

0.42

528

0.43

189

261

78

0.395

0.18

0.38

0.04

0.03

2

139

0.83

63

62

14

0.10

172

0.65

59

81

32

0.186

0.04

0.01

rs6506891

1

T/A

526

0.00

285

143

98

0.32

526

0.00

299

151

76

0.288

0.19

0.38

0.78

0.41

2

142

0.93

64

63

15

0.11

173

0.81

58

83

32

0.185

0.04

0.01

rs2118343

1

C/G

528

0.83

309

191

28

0.23

526

0.32

318

187

21

0.218

0.56

0.41

0.76

0.45

2

142

0.53

97

42

3

0.02

173

0.18

101

58

14

0.081

0.03

0.02

Significant values has been emphasized by italic

aMajor/minor allele, major and minor alleles are denoted by D and d, respectively

bNumber of samples which are well genotyped

cP values in the parenthesis were analyzed with 10,000 random permutations

Fig. 1

Haplotype block structure of the CDNF2 gene in both SZ patients and healthy controls in stage 2 samples. The index association SNP is represented by a diamond. The colors of the remaining SNPs (circles) indicate LD with the index SNP based on pairwise r2 values from our data

Table 2

Haplotypes of CDNF2 in stage 2 patients with SZ

Haplotype

Case (freq)

Control (freq)

Chi square

P value

Odds ratio (95% CI)

CAGAG

157.87 (0.57)

169.89 (0.50)

2.25

0.13

1.29 (0.94–1.78)

TGATC

45.87 (0.17)

82.00 (0.24)

6.38

0.01

0.61 (0.41–0.92)

TGATG

43.00 (0.16)

57.90 (0.17)

0.30

0.58

0.88 (0.57–1.35)

TGGAG

30.13 (0.11)

26.11 (0.08)

2.61

0.11

1.44 (0.83–2.51)

Significant value has been emphasized by italic

CI confidence interval

To explore the association between CDNF2 variations and SZ symptoms, 371 first-onset SZ patients (stage 1, n = 228 and stage 2, n = 143) with complete PANSS scores were selected from stages 1 and 2. Only rs2577075 genotypes were associated with cognition factor scores in stage 2 samples after Bonferroni correction (F = 3.39; P = 0.03) (Table 3). We also only found rs2577075 genotypes were associated with cognition factor scores in female when subdivided by gender after Bonferroni correction (F = 4.05; P = 0.04). Other SNPs from stage 1 and 2 samples did not show any associations (P > 0.05). However, rs2118343 genotypes were significantly associated with negative factor scores when stage 1 and 2 samples were combined (F = 4.396, P = 0.01). We found rs2118343 genotypes were associated with depression/anxiety and excitement/hostility scores in female when subdivided by gender in combined samples after Bonferroni correction (F = 4.39, 4.73; P = 0.04, 0.03, respectively).
Table 3

Association analysis between five factors of PANSS and five SNPs of CDNF2 in patients with SZ

SNP

Genotype

Total PANSS

Positive

Negative

Depression/anxiety

Cognition

Excitement/hostility

Stage 1

Stage 2

Stage 1

Stage 2

Stage 1

Stage 2

Stage 1

Stage 2

Stage 1

Stage 2

Stage 1

Stage 2

rs2577075

AA

80.46 ± 18.15

86.36 ± 8.49

20.22 ± 6.60

22.63 ± 5.53

17.02 ± 5.45

19.70 ± 3.39

14.39 ± 2.97

14.51 ± 2.28

16.73 ± 5.62

17.21 ± 3.93*

7.44 ± 3.53

6.93 ± 2.99

AG

81.24 ± 20.65

84.67 ± 11.44

20.49 ± 8.02

22.17 ± 5.95

17.76 ± 5.73

19.81 ± 3.25

13.70 ± 3.53

14.35 ± 2.75

16.67 ± 5.22

15.85 ± 3.71*

7.58 ± 4.03

7.22 ± 3.03

GG

84.45 ± 19.93

81.79 ± 10.21

19.83 ± 7.23

21. 09 ± 6.60

19.03 ± 5.53

18.74 ± 2.70

14.85 ± 3.39

13.35 ± 2.23

17.90 ± 5.20

14.87 ± 3.14*

7.33 ± 3.96

7.43 ± 3.13

rs2577074

AA

84.45 ± 19.93

83.16 ± 9.36

19.83 ± 7.23

22.14 ± 5.56

19.03 ± 5.53

19.30 ± 2.79

14.85 ± 3.39

14.11 ± 2.63

17.90 ± 5.20

15.95 ± 4.08

7.33 ± 3.96

6.50 ± 2.66

AG

81.24 ± 20.65

85.75 ± 10.34

20.49 ± 8.02

21.99 ± 6.14

17.76 ± 5.73

19.59 ± 3.34

13.70 ± 3.53

14.51 ± 2.38

16.67 ± 5.22

16.17 ± 3.75

7.58 ± 4.03

7.62 ± 3.05

GG

80.46 ± 18.15

84.48 ± 12.39

20.22 ± 6.60

22.54 ± 6.09

17.02 ± 5.45

20.17 ± 3.62

14.39 ± 2.97

13.63 ± 2.83

16.73 ± 5.62

16.21 ± 3.26

7.44 ± 3.53

7.04 ± 3.41

rs2249810

AA

82.33 ± 21.05

87.79 ± 14.62

18.87 ± 7.51

23.07 ± 6.58

18.80 ± 5.80

21.00 ± 4.28

15.03 ± 3.54

13.86 ± 3.03

17.70 ± 5.55

16.57 ± 3.82

6.80 ± 3.89

6.71 ± 3.43

AG

81.67 ± 20.87

85.00 ± 10.52

20.46 ± 8.01

21.97 ± 6.19

17.85 ± 5.84

19.60 ± 3.03

13.66 ± 3.57

14.38 ± 2.53

16.88 ± 5.35

16.29 ± 3.54

7.68 ± 4.05

7.32 ± 3.19

GG

81.77 ± 17.73

83.92 ± 9.27

20.74 ± 6.54

21.90 ± 5.56

17.42 ± 5.20

19.27 ± 3.12

14.42 ± 2.88

14.25 ± 2.48

16.74 ± 5.18

16.05 ± 3.92

7.57 ± 3.61

7.17 ± 2.83

rs2118343a

CC

82.74 ± 19.47

85.00 ± 2.00

21.04 ± 7.30

19.33 ± 0.58

17.71 ± 5.57

20.00 ± 3.46

14.38 ± 3.23

13.33 ± 2.52

17.23 ± 5.47

18.33 ± 3.51

7.43 ± 3.93

8.00 ± 4.00

CG

80.05 ± 20.86

85.17 ± 10.43

19.03 ± 7.57

21.90 ± 5.72

17.90 ± 5.77

19.35 ± 3.29

13.63 ± 3.58

13.90 ± 2.41

16.63 ± 5.22

16.53 ± 3.45

7.68 ± 3.84

7.60 ± 3.21

GG

85.43 ± 15.64

84.50 ± 10.63

20.71 ± 8.28

22.32 ± 6.09

20.14 ± 5.18

19.68 ± 3.21

15.71 ± 3.20

14.40 ± 2.61

16.71 ± 4.23

15.86 ± 3.88

6.43 ± 3.82

6.96 ± 2.92

rs6506891

AA

81.07 ± 20.23

84.08 ± 9.28

18.48 ± 7.34

22.06 ± 5.66

18.55 ± 5.74

19.31 ± 3.11

15.14 ± 3.55

14.27 ± 2.46

17.55 ± 5.59

15.95 ± 3.97

6.41 ± 3.33

7.17 ± 2.81

AT

79.48 ± 20.69

84.84 ± 10.51

19.08 ± 7.65

21.93 ± 6.14

17.69 ± 5.61

19.63 ± 3.01

13.29 ± 3.56

14.34 ± 2.53

16.31 ± 4.84

16.20 ± 3.58

7.85 ± 3.92

7.32 ± 3.17

TT

82.94 ± 19.02

86.87 ± 14.53

21.39 ± 7.24

23.20 ± 6.36

17.68 ± 5.60

20.67 ± 4.32

14.32 ± 3.15

13.67 ± 3.02

17.10 ± 5.49

16.40 ± 3.74

7.52 ± 3.86

6.53 ± 3.38

P < 0.05, compared with each other genotype, LSD tests

aCombine stage 1 and 2 samples: rs2118343 genotypes were significantly associated with negative factor scores

Discussion

This study investigated CDNF2 mutations associated with SZ and associated symptoms in the Han Chinese population. Significant differences were found in genotype and allele frequencies of rs2249810 between SZ patients and healthy controls, suggesting that CDNF2 is a susceptibility gene for SZ. We also found that rs2118343 genotypes are associated with negative psychotic symptoms of SZ.

CDNF has strong neuroprotective and restorative effects in animal models of PD [22], and protects dopaminergic neurons in the 6-hydroxydopamine rat model [14, 23]. However, the genotype and allele frequencies of the CDNF SNPs rs1901650 and rs11259365 did not differ between PD patients and controls; only the C allele of CDNF rs7094179, an intronic SNP, has been linked to PD susceptibility [24, 25].

Intron variant was relation to the CDNF2 gene organization. CDNF2 can protect and repair the dopaminergic system, and may thus have an important role in PD [14, 26, 27]. Five SNPs of CDNF2 in our study were located in intron region of chromosome 10, which variation may lead to dopaminergic system disfunction. Meanwhile, multiple SZ susceptibility loci have been found on chromosome 10 [7, 8]. In stage 1 samples, we did not detect any associations in paranoid SZ patients, possibly because we did not examine other SZ subtypes. We therefore included the undifferentiated subtype in the stage 2 analysis, and found that rs2249810 of CDNF2 may be a susceptibility locus in SZ.

SZ is influenced by dopamine, glutamate, and serotonin neurotransmission systems. We previously reported associations between Solute carrier family 6 member 4 [17] in the serotoninergic system and Glutamate ionotropic receptor NMDA type subunit 2B [16] and Reelin [28] in the glutamatergic system and SZ. The present study focused on CDNF2 because of its role in the dopaminergic system. Our results from two sets of samples suggest that SNP rs2249810 of CDNF2 may be a susceptibility locus for SZ and provide evidence that it is caused by the interaction of a large number of susceptibility genes [29]. To date, there has been a lot of GWAS researches on the susceptibility site of SZ [711, 30], and a recent meta-analysis using GWAS data also found 30 new sites [31]. However, there is still no reported association between CDNF2 and SZ. The difference between GWAS and our research is samples selected more than three groups and multi-ethnic in the former, one group and only Han Chinese people in the latter. Therefore, our sample has a single genetic background. Meanwhile, we found rs2577075 genotypes and haplotype TGATC may be susceptibility factors of SZ in stage 2 samples, but those results were not found in total samples. That may be the majority of the samples were paranoid, and with less undifferentiated in total samples. Therefore, those results need to be further validated in a large sample, especially in the samples with multiple subtypes of SZ.

SZ is characterized by positive and negative symptoms, cognitive deficits, and disorganization of thoughts and behaviors [32, 33]. SZ is considered a dopamine disorder based on the psychosis-inducing effects of dopamine-releasing drugs such as amphetamines, and the anti-psychotic effects of drugs that block the dopamine D2 receptor [34]. Dopamine dysfunction has been identified as the major cause of SZ [35]. Our results have shown that CDNF2 gene polymorphisms underlie the manifestations of SZ symptoms; moreover, rs2118343 genotypes were associated with negative factor subscores in SZ patients; this provides the first evidence of an association between CDNF2 and negative symptoms in SZ and is consistent with our previous observations of a genetic basis for SZ symptoms [16, 17, 28].

This study had some limitations. Firstly, our sample size was not large enough to obtain complete PANSS scores. Secondly, although we validated our results in two independent datasets, undifferentiated subtypes were only included in the stage 2 analysis.

Conclusion

In summary, our findings suggest that SNP rs2249810 of CDNF2 is a novel susceptibility locus in SZ. Additional studies are needed to determine whether there are other SNPs associated with specific SZ subtypes (catatonic, collapse, and residual) and ethnic populations.

Abbreviations

SZ: 

schizophrenia

CDNF: 

cerebral dopamine neurotrophic factor

BDNF: 

brain-derived neurotrophic factor

PD: 

Parkinson’s disease

SNPs: 

single nucleotide polymorphisms

DSM-IV: 

diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders fourth edition

OR: 

odds ratio

95% CI: 

95% confidence intervals

LD: 

linkage disequilibrium

ANOVA: 

analysis of variance

PANSS: 

positive and negative symptom scale

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

LL and JT participated in the design of the study and made final approval of the version to be published. YY, WL and BL were involved in drafting the manuscript and data analysis. WL, YY, and HZ carried out the molecular genetic examination. YY, HY, SD and YL conducted sample selection and data management. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the patient, their families, and the healthy volunteers for their participation, and the physicians who collect clinical data and blood samples in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study protocol was in accordance with principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University. Written, informed consent obtained from each participant after they were informed of the purpose and procedures of the study. All authors had no access to information that could identify individual participants during or after data collection.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81371472 and U1404811), the National Key Basic Research and Development Program (973) (Grant 2011CB707800), the Medical Science and Technology Foundation of Henan Province (201702131), the Open Project Program of the National Laboratory of Pattern Recognition (NLPR) (201600010).

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Key Laboratory for NeuroInformation of Ministry of Education, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
(2)
Department of Psychiatry, Henan Mental Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang, China
(3)
Henan Key Lab of Biological Psychiatry, Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang, China
(4)
Brainnetome Center, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
(5)
National Laboratory of Pattern Recognition, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
(6)
The Queensland Brain Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
(7)
Department of Psychiatry of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang, China

References

  1. Schultz SK, Andreasen NC. Schizophrenia. Lancet. 1999;353:1425–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Kendler KS, Eaves LJ. Psychiatric genetics (Review of Psychiatry). Washington: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2005.Google Scholar
  3. Lichtenstein P, Yip BH, Björk C, Pawitan Y, Cannon TD, Sullivan PF, et al. Common genetic determinants of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder in Swedish families: a population-based study. Lancet. 2009;373:234–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Nordentoft M, Mortensen PB, Pedersen CB. Absolute risk of suicide after first hospital contact in mental disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2011;68(10):1058–64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Saha S, Chant D, McGrath J. A systematic review of mortality in schizophrenia: is the differential mortality gap worsening over time? Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007;64(10):1123–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Owen MJ, Craddock N, O’Donovan MC. Schizophrenia: genes at last? Trends Genet. 2005;21:518–25.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Ripke S, O’Dushlaine C, Chambert K, Moran JL, Kähler AK, Akterin S, et al. Genome-wide association analysis identifies 13 new risk loci for schizophrenia. Nat Genet. 2013;45:1150–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Hamshere ML, Walters JT, Smith R, Richards AL, Green E, Grozeva D, et al. Genome-wide significant associations in schizophrenia to ITIH3/4, CACNA1C and SDCCAG8, and extensive replication of associations reported by the Schizophrenia PGC. Mol Psychiatry. 2013;18:708–12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Yue WH, Wang HF, Sun LD, Tang FL, Liu ZH, Zhang HX, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies a susceptibility locus for schizophrenia in Han Chinese at 11p11.2. Nat Genet. 2011;43:1228–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Shi Y, Li Z, Xu Q, Wang T, Li T, Shen J, et al. Common variants on 8p12 and 1q24.2 confer risk of schizophrenia. Nat Genet. 2011;43:1224–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Schizophrenia Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium. Biological insights from 108 schizophrenia-associated genetic loci. Nature. 2014;511:421–7.View ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. McGuffin P, Owen MJ, Farmer AE. Genetic basis of schizophrenia. Lancet. 1995;346:678–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Fernandes BS, Berk M, Turck CW, Steiner J, Gonçalves CA. Decreased peripheral brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels are a biomarker of disease activity in major psychiatric disorders: a comparative meta-analysis. Mol Psychiatry. 2014;19:750–1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Lindholm P, Voutilainen MH, Laurén J, Peränen J, Leppänen VM, Andressoo JO, et al. Novel neurotrophic factor CDNF protects and rescues midbrain dopamine neurons in vivo. Nature. 2007;448:73–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Tang T, Li Y, Jiao Q, Du X, Jiang H, et al. Cerebral dopamine neurotrophic factor: a potential therapeutic agent for Parkinson’s disease. Neurosci Bull. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12264-017-0123-4.PubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Yang Y, Li W, Zhang H, Yang G, Wang X, Ding M, et al. Association study of N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor subunit 2B (GRIN2B) polymorphisms and schizophrenia symptoms in the Chinese-Han population. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0125925.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Li W, Yang Y, Lin J, Wang S, Zhao J, Yang G, et al. Association of serotonin transporter gene (SLC6A4) polymorphisms with schizophrenia susceptibility and symptoms in a Chinese-Han population. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2013;44:290–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Kim JH, Kim SY, Lee J, Oh KJ, Kim YB, Cho ZH. Evaluation of the factor structure of symptoms in patients with schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res. 2012;197:285–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Kay SR, Fiszbein A, Opler LA. The positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 1987;13:261–76.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A-G, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39:175–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang A-G. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009;41:1149–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Kemppainen S, Lindholm P, Galli E, Lahtinen HM, Koivisto H, Hämäläinen E, et al. Cerebral dopamine neurotrophic factor improves long-term memory in APP/PS1 transgenic mice modeling Alzheimer’s disease as well as in wild-type mice. Behav Brain Res. 2015;291:1–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Bäck S, Peränen J, Galli E, Pulkkila P, Lonka-Nevalaita L, Tamminen T, et al. Gene therapy with AAV2-CDNF provides functional benefits in a rat model of Parkinson’s disease. Brain Behav. 2013;3:75–88.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Choi JM, Hong JH, Chae MJ, Ngyuen PH, Kang HS, Ma HI, et al. Analysis of mutations and the association between polymorphisms in the cerebral dopamine neurotrophic factor (CDNF) gene and Parkinson disease. Neurosci Lett. 2011;493:97–101.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Lindholm D, Mäkelä J, Di Liberto V, Mudò G, Belluardo N, Eriksson O, et al. Current disease modifying approaches to treat Parkinson’s disease. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2016;73(7):1365–79.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Voutilainen MH, Bäck S, Pörsti E, Toppinen L, Lindgren L, Lindholm P, et al. Mesencephalic astrocyte-derived neurotrophic factor is neurorestorative in rat model of Parkinson’s disease. J Neurosci. 2009;29:9651–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Airavaara M, Harvey BK, Voutilainen MH, Shen H, Chou J, Lindholm P, et al. CDNF protects the nigrostriatal dopamine system and promotes recovery after MPTP treatment in mice. Cell Transplant. 2012;21(6):1213–23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Li W, Song X, Zhang H, Yang Y, Jiang C, Xiao B, et al. Association study of RELN polymorphisms with schizophrenia in Han Chinese population. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2011;35:1505–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Ross CA, Margolis RL, Reading SA, Pletnikov M, Coyle JT. Neurobiology of schizophrenia. Neuron. 2006;52:139–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Schizophrenia Psychiatric Genome-Wide Association Study (GWAS) Consortium. Genome-wide association study identifies five new schizophrenia loci. Nat Genet. 2011;43(10):969–76.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Li Z, Chen J, Yu H, He L, Xu Y, Zhang D, et al. Genome-wide association analysis identifies 30 new susceptibility loci for schizophrenia. Nat Genet. 2017;49(11):1576–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Muesser KT, McGurk SR. Schizophrenia. Lancet. 2004;363:2063–72.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Austin J. Schizophrenia: an update and review. J Genet Couns. 2005;14:329–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Carlsson A. The current status of the dopamine hypothesis of schizophrenia. Neuropsychopharmacology. 1988;1:179–86.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Abi-Dargham A. Schizophrenia: overview and dopamine dysfunction. J Clin Psychiatry. 2014;75:e31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2018

Advertisement